The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
Deja Entendu
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:17 pm
Reputation: 363
Location: Philly

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Deja Entendu »

GreatTimes wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 9:29 am
Buc2 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 7:50 am

Doc, he's had 8 years to "get it." He hasn't got it. The end.
Mayfield was 2-5 with the Rams. They decided not to resign Baker and instead replaced him with Stetson Bennett. That should tell you something right there that the Rams believed that they are a better team with a Rookie QB over Mayfield.
Or he decided not to resign with them. He wanted to start and their starter is Stafford.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Baker could've stayed with the Rams or gone elsewhere for more money, but he isn't beating out Stafford, get real. He wanted a competition. McVay was has repeated his love for Baker, and had this to say about y'all...
"He’s done a great job and if this hasn’t elevated people’s opinions and thoughts of him, I’m not sure what he could’ve done to change whatever the perception is," McVay said. "I just know I think very highly of him and I’ve loved working with him.”

All the silly Holmes coming out telling us "that should tell you"...

The greatest coach of all time didn't want Tom... that should tell you...
The Rams and Giants both ditched Warner... that should tell you...
Vikings and Redskins both moved on Brad Johnson... that should tell you...
Vikings, Redskins, and Chiefs all didn't like Rich Gannon... that should tell you...
Trent Diler and Steve Young couldn't even start for the sucky Bucs... that should tell you...


When did we just submit ourselves to the judgments and opinions of other franchises? Especially lesser ones like Cleveland and Carolina? Like, come on.
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1091

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Buc2 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 7:50 am
Doctor wrote: Sun Apr 30, 2023 4:33 pm Again, that's that hero worshiping, rookie savior, manifest destiny BS. You throw out literally everything else that goes into the game and you put it purely on one guys shoulders.

I get why it's a tempting dogma to have. It gives you hope the inverse is true, and Caleb or whoever can just walk in and cure everything with his two hands.

It's just such a trash philosophy to apply to football.
Doc, he's had 8 years to "get it." He hasn't got it. The end.
Who has had 8 years?
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8944
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 3118
Location: Virginia

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Buc2 »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 9:52 am
Buc2 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 7:50 am

Doc, he's had 8 years to "get it." He hasn't got it. The end.
Who has had 8 years?
I misinterpreted MJW's comment...thought she was commenting on Jameis Winston with her reply to 13F11B. After rereading it, I see I was wrong. Allen and Mayfield came into the league in 2018. Jameis came into the league in 2015. My bad.
Image
Don't tread on me
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4879
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1215

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by 13F11B »

Barnzy wrote: Sun Apr 30, 2023 11:26 pm What's the upside with Baker?
His last name is early in the alphabet? Being excited about Baker is like being excited about saving money on your car insurance with Geico. Same old piece of crap car, but you aren't paying as much for it.
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »



MANY such cases! Crazy physical specimen, and then….
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

That could come back to bite them, ala Josh Jacobs, or if we want to keep with Card players ala Hassan Riddick (who would go on to a prove it deal before getting paid by his third team). What the heck is Simmons even labeled as anymore? A CB, LB, S? It's going to huge sticking point should he show out and they try to tag him.

Simmons is a very special use case sort of defender and one you need to put into a position to make plays for your unit. The fact that Ganon is cold on a player like Simmons instead of excited to raise him up speaks to what CJ Gardner was talking about when he called out Ganon after the Super Bowl.

Vance always spoke well of Isiah and how he wanted to use him only to have that get shelved as injuries would force Vance to use Simmons as a multi-position band aid instead of as a starter with his own role. One of the unspoken side effects of regime change is finding your talent now miscast. Maybe the opposite happens and by being put into a single, classic role Isiah opens back up again.

Either way I'd be all for going after him next offseason if he "busts out" of Arizona.
Image
Nobody
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:49 pm
Reputation: 1027

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Nobody »

Snake wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 8:47 pm

MANY such cases! Crazy physical specimen, and then….
Lateral explosively, deceleration with balance/control/flexion, start-stop are so profoundly more important than north/south explosivity (ESPECIALLY if you aren’t in control/balance).

The seduction of 40s and verts and broad jumps is not good. I would wager a small fortune that, as a cohort, they don’t correlate tightly to football excellence across the entire population of + players.

I’ll bet that they correlate with increased injuries when coupled with reduced balance, body control, and the ability for connective tissue to decelerate and dissipate the increased load!
Deja Entendu
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:17 pm
Reputation: 363
Location: Philly

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Deja Entendu »

Snake wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 8:47 pm

MANY such cases! Crazy physical specimen, and then….
I’d swap him for White
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/05/02/nfl-p ... 732&pid=30

Power rankings are crap, but this gives you a decent idea about how the team is currently perceived.

29th.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 10:53 am https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/05/02/nfl-p ... 732&pid=30

Power rankings are crap, but this gives you a decent idea about how the team is currently perceived.

29th.
Seems about right. We have the absolute worst QB situation in the league. We carried a ton of dead cap and we have a pretty old roster as well.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Perception. Where were the Lions or Seahawks this time last year?

We're basically using Seattle blueprint for the offense. Only we have a much better defense on the other side and have Baker/Trask > Geno/Lock.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

We mistaking Todd Bowles for Pete Carroll or something? How in the hell are we using the Seahawks blueprint?
Most hated man in America.
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Doctor wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 11:36 am Baker/Trask > Geno/Lock.
Not really sure how you’re getting there.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:10 pm
Doctor wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 11:36 am Baker/Trask > Geno/Lock.
Not really sure how you’re getting there.
I don't think even he knows. Doc has had some kind of LUGZ level meltdown over the past few months to where everything he says is very contentious and passive aggressive.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
_MB_
Posts: 9297
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:28 am
Reputation: 1988

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by _MB_ »

We're just not going to look good on paper this year.
Image
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:28 pm
Snake wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:10 pm

Not really sure how you’re getting there.
I don't think even he knows. Doc has had some kind of LUGZ level meltdown over the past few months to where everything he says is very contentious and passive aggressive.
Right. The logic is everyone wrote off the Seahawks because of their quarterback situation going into the season. And he’s positing that Baker/Trask is better on paper than Lock/Smith was on paper…prior to Smith reversing the trajectory on his career.

Maybe. But does it really matter if they were marginally better? For this to work, It’s assuming that Baker or Trask elevates themselves to a nearly top 10 quarterback in the league the same way that Smith did.

To be clear, I'm not opposed to figuring out what we have in Trask as things currently stand. Baker? Meh. Is what he is and his contract says as much. Sort of glad they didn't invest in a QB in this draft, as well. It's a good year to be bad, if that's what happens. and it appears Vegas, most fans, and writers feel that is what is coming.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:38 pm
Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:28 pm

I don't think even he knows. Doc has had some kind of LUGZ level meltdown over the past few months to where everything he says is very contentious and passive aggressive.
Right. The logic is everyone wrote off the Seahawks because of their quarterback situation going into the season. And he’s positing that Baker/Trask is better on paper than Lock/Smith was on paper…prior to Smith reversing the trajectory on his career.

Maybe. But does it really matter if they were marginally better? For this to work, It’s assuming that Baker or Trask elevates themselves to a nearly top 10 quarterback in the league the same way that Smith did.
No one is in a position to defend Kyle Trask being better than ANYBODY at this point. Not even Doc is going down that road. The other 3 have at least started a game and played more than a handful of snaps. But saying Baker Mayfield is better than Geno Smith pre-2022 or Drew Lock is a lot of "tallest little person" logic there.

Another thing at play, the 2022 Seahawks did better than the 2022 Bucs. And that's with us having Tom Brady. Doc is counting on Baker or Trask being better than Brady. Good luck there as well.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8944
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 3118
Location: Virginia

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Buc2 »

Snake wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 10:53 am https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/05/02/nfl-p ... 732&pid=30

Power rankings are crap, but this gives you a decent idea about how the team is currently perceived.

29th.
He really has no idea what they're gonna get from a season of Love, but he has the Packers at 15th? Of course, 15th would mean missing the playoffs, so...

But, yeah, way too early to take any power rankings seriously.
Image
Don't tread on me
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 11:49 am We mistaking Todd Bowles for Pete Carroll or something? How in the hell are we using the Seahawks blueprint?
Of course not, Bowles has actually fielded a top 10 defense this decade.
Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:58 pm No one is in a position to defend Kyle Trask being better than ANYBODY at this point. Not even Doc is going down that road. The other 3 have at least started a game and played more than a handful of snaps. But saying Baker Mayfield is better than Geno Smith pre-2022 or Drew Lock is a lot of "tallest little person" logic there.
True. Likewise the opposite is also true. No one has any position to attack Trask, yet somehow it's become the cool thing to do. I was merely pointing to yet another QB competition that on the surface looked worse than our current one yet bore fruit (I know, I know, the only real way to get a franchise QB is by tanking).

The only thing I've been passive-aggressive towards are people who attack anyone not on the Tank for Caleb wagon and who are already rolled over and shown their underbelly for the season.

Take these power rankings for example. Look at how many teams have huge QB questions yet somehow "hope" is acceptable, even encouraged. But hey, a former #1 with a great list of believers vs a second round pick, well that needs to be trashed because... something something... future resources... something... not tanking... something something...


Image
Sdbucs
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 298

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Sdbucs »

Doctor wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 3:28 pm
Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 11:49 am We mistaking Todd Bowles for Pete Carroll or something? How in the hell are we using the Seahawks blueprint?
Of course not, Bowles has actually fielded a top 10 defense this decade.
Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 12:58 pm No one is in a position to defend Kyle Trask being better than ANYBODY at this point. Not even Doc is going down that road. The other 3 have at least started a game and played more than a handful of snaps. But saying Baker Mayfield is better than Geno Smith pre-2022 or Drew Lock is a lot of "tallest little person" logic there.
True. Likewise the opposite is also true. No one has any position to attack Trask, yet somehow it's become the cool thing to do. I was merely pointing to yet another QB competition that on the surface looked worse than our current one yet bore fruit (I know, I know, the only real way to get a franchise QB is by tanking).

The only thing I've been passive-aggressive towards are people who attack anyone not on the Tank for Caleb wagon and who are already rolled over and shown their underbelly for the season.

Take these power rankings for example. Look at how many teams have huge QB questions yet somehow "hope" is acceptable, even encouraged. But hey, a former #1 with a great list of believers vs a second round pick, well that needs to be trashed because... something something... future resources... something... not tanking... something something...


But Kyle Trask threw a bad pass in training camp and was third on the depth chart!!!!!!! His career is over, haven't you heard?

He actually doesn't look that incredible in the first few minutes of that twitter video there, however.. weak wobbly ball
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3869
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2493
Location: West Coast

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Cheb »

A former top overall pick versus an unproven second rounder? Well that's an easy competition. It'll be Baker by a country mile.

Image
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

The newly signed Free Agent vs the Day 2 pick, it's a wrap.

Image
Image
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Trask and Baker are less talented than everyone in these pictures. Okay, maybe not
Flynn lmao

But point taken.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Wentz is there for the taking as well
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4879
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1215

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by 13F11B »

I have faith in Trask until he blows it for two years. Give the man a chance.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Trask won't get 2 years.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4879
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1215

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by 13F11B »

Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 5:04 pm Trask won't get 2 years.
Why do you think that? Is it because you expect Bowles to be fired and the new coach will want his own guy?
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

13F11B wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 5:06 pm
Bootz wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 5:04 pm Trask won't get 2 years.
Why do you think that? Is it because you expect Bowles to be fired and the new coach will want his own guy?
Because he's not even getting 1 year. Baker Mayfield is the QB here. If we have to go to Trask it likely means it's too late on the season anyway. Trask might play let's say 8-9 games. Unless he's been Superman all along, Bowles/Licht are done.

So 2024 rolls around. Trask is in his contract year. Do I see a new HC/GM being married to Trask? Absolutely not. It's likely a rookie.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Or am I not reading the room well and we're pretending there's going to be an actual "QB competition"?
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Naismith
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:41 am
Reputation: 32

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Naismith »

Both QBs will start games this year barring an injury that prevents one from playing at all. They will each get a chance to prove they belong. My feeling is that you can’t win a championship with either guy but strange things happen.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6620
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1703
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Naismith wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 5:17 pm Both QBs will start games this year barring an injury that prevents one from playing at all. They will each get a chance to prove they belong. My feeling is that you can’t win a championship with either guy but strange things happen.
You're talking as in it'll be week to week as to who starts?
Most hated man in America.
Obsolete
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 3:19 pm
Reputation: 188

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Obsolete »

When you have 2 qbs, you have 0 qbs.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Boy it's gonna be fun when we 3peat the division and people are still crying to fire Licht/Bowles because it's the only way they know how to cheer.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4642
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1208

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Obsolete wrote: Tue May 02, 2023 5:25 pm When you have 2 qbs, you have 0 qbs.
Just out of curiosity, how many QBs do the 49ers have? Titans? The Packers? The Packers last year?
Image
Post Reply