Lot of holes on defense, man.
The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
It comes down to price (and preparing accordingly). if he comes back for cheap, I still wouldn’t put myself in a position to depend on him.
Don’t get me wrong, I love the guy. On the field, off the field. Him playing for another team is gonna fucking suck. especially if he’s still able to produce.
It’s just a matter of probabilities and roster construction at this point.

- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
McMillan is here.
Defense needs a shot in the arm and a more veteran presence. FA should be used to fill the defense and not with Jordan Whitehead types.
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Godwin has the option of being resigned to a reasonable deal. Y'all acting like we had to franchise him or let him go.
If Godwin wants to do that, I'd welcome him back. But if he wants to go elsewhere and chase the money, I wish him well. He's the second best receiver in Bucs history, imo, and I would gladly buy him a beer, thank him for playing for the Bucs, and talk ball anytime.
If Godwin wants to do that, I'd welcome him back. But if he wants to go elsewhere and chase the money, I wish him well. He's the second best receiver in Bucs history, imo, and I would gladly buy him a beer, thank him for playing for the Bucs, and talk ball anytime.

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
All those things are possible.
I can see LVD retiring, JTS and Godwin going elsewhere. I can also see anyone of them or even all three back when the dust settles. It's the offseason.
As long as LVD doesn't go elsewhere I'm good.
I can see LVD retiring, JTS and Godwin going elsewhere. I can also see anyone of them or even all three back when the dust settles. It's the offseason.
As long as LVD doesn't go elsewhere I'm good.

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
I believe Trask will be back if we don’t get a quarterback from free agency or the draft.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
WR A:
34 catches, 525 yards, 1 TD
WR B:
37 catches, 461 yards, 8 TDs
34 catches, 525 yards, 1 TD
WR B:
37 catches, 461 yards, 8 TDs
Most hated man in America.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
There are only so many picks.Primeminister wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pmThe only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.
Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.
I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
If Godwin signs elsewhere, we will probably get a third or fourth round comp pick
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Right. We did fine developing a young Chris Godwin into the player he is now. Surely our FO has confidence Jalen McMillan can follow in his footsteps.
Most hated man in America.
- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
You make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 amThere are only so many picks.Primeminister wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pm
The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.
Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.
I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
Most hated man in America.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Trades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.Bootz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:52 amYou make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am
There are only so many picks.
You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.
Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.
I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 amThere are only so many picks.Primeminister wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pm
The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.
Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.
I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
It took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:15 amTrades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.Bootz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:52 am
You make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.
I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
He's not even 29 yet. No reason? There are all kinds of reasons. Great player. Great person. Great teammate. We started Sterling Shephard all year so the WR room needs depth regardless. Several teams have 2 WRs making good money. It's not a cost issue.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:32 am“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am
There are only so many picks.
You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.
Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.
I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
He still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:33 amIt took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:15 am
Trades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.
I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
It is a cost issue when that #2 receiver is as often injured as Godwin. Add in the fact that his style of play, while electric, lends him to increased injuries going forward. If Godwin is not playing the same style of play he is less valuable to us, but if he plays the style we love is less available to us (due to injury).Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:37 amHe's not even 29 yet. No reason? There are all kinds of reasons. Great player. Great person. Great teammate. We started Sterling Shephard all year so the WR room needs depth regardless. Several teams have 2 WRs making good money. It's not a cost issue.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:32 am
“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.
You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
I think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:41 amHe still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:33 am
It took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?
I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
He was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:43 amI think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:41 am
He still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.
I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
But, we'll see what they do.
-
Four Verticals
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:37 am
- Reputation: 249
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
I’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Whats the argument here? That we can't afford to draft a WR in the 2nd, 3rd or 4th round so we have to pay Chris Godwin?
Most hated man in America.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
There are all kinds of arguments and scenarios. I think the road to a better roster in 2025 and beyond includes Chris Godwin. You don't. That's ok. Neither of us get to choose.
You can sign Godwin and still draft another WR in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th round.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
He was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:47 amHe was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:43 am
I think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).
But, we'll see what they do.
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1186
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
We actually get 2025 cap relief by re-signing Godwin.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Fair enough. If you're going into free agency and only signing players who've never had injuries your list will be pretty small.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:03 pmHe was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:47 am
He was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.
But, we'll see what they do.
And to @BucsNBills point if they can get him signed before 2/20 they'd slow his void money down.
- Bootz
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5458
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
There's a 0% chance of him being re-signed by February 20th. I explained that last week, doing that with void years only pushes that eventual hit down the line and increases it substantially. We aren't doing that and we shouldn't.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:23 pmFair enough. If you're going into free agency and only signing players who've never had injuries your list will be pretty small.Primeminister wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:03 pm
He was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.
And to @BucsNBills point if they can get him signed before 2/20 they'd slow his void money down.
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
I'm not here to have an opinion on signing or drafting injury-prone players. I was a huge advocate of drafting AWJr due to his on-field attributes, but his injury history was a concern. Despite the concern, I was a big proponent of drafting him. He got dinged a little in year 2 and year 3 and year 5 (last year) was a calamity for him regarding injuries (I would bet he was playing waaaaay below 100 % in that playoff game). So those concerns are starting to mount there.
However, just like it is enormously difficult to replace an enormously versatile FS with the extraordinary football instincts, top shelf read & react, omnidirectional mobility, and willingness physically, same can be said for a WR like Godwin. The league has a dearth of players who check all the following boxes:
* Route running savant across the whole tree.
* Tackle breaker in tiny-space.
* Catch-point dominator.
* Heady in sight adjust against blitz.
* Dominator in the running game.
So, yeah. Injuries mounting. But if that physical checks out (and ankle injury recovery is crazy these days), and you don't sign him...these guys don't grow on trees. Coen had to significantly change the offense without Godwin (he did...but having both approaches of "Before/After Godwin" would be pretty great).
The only possible solve here would be to turn White into a gadget player that sees the field in abundance and eats up a lot of that Godwin territory. He certainly can't win all the ways Godwin does (that 1st and 3rd bullet point aren't in play), but he can absolutely do a chunk of that work (while being an asset/weapon in 21 personnel as the Orbit/Jet player).
However, just like it is enormously difficult to replace an enormously versatile FS with the extraordinary football instincts, top shelf read & react, omnidirectional mobility, and willingness physically, same can be said for a WR like Godwin. The league has a dearth of players who check all the following boxes:
* Route running savant across the whole tree.
* Tackle breaker in tiny-space.
* Catch-point dominator.
* Heady in sight adjust against blitz.
* Dominator in the running game.
So, yeah. Injuries mounting. But if that physical checks out (and ankle injury recovery is crazy these days), and you don't sign him...these guys don't grow on trees. Coen had to significantly change the offense without Godwin (he did...but having both approaches of "Before/After Godwin" would be pretty great).
The only possible solve here would be to turn White into a gadget player that sees the field in abundance and eats up a lot of that Godwin territory. He certainly can't win all the ways Godwin does (that 1st and 3rd bullet point aren't in play), but he can absolutely do a chunk of that work (while being an asset/weapon in 21 personnel as the Orbit/Jet player).
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
The widespread claims of Chiefs getting calls is a serious issue for the NFL that can’t be ignored. It’s not some fringe conspiracy, is the mainstream stance of many fans in the NFL. The integrity of the game cannot be in question or it all falls apart. Goodell needs to take action this offseason.
For one, penalties need to be challengable/reviewable.
A rule change I think must be implemented is tracking chips in the balls. The technology is there. There is no reason professional football should be guessing the spot of the ball, especially in a pile.
Give the goal line pylons as well as the line to gain markers trackers that detect when the ball passes through them. Hell, give them lights that light up for all to see when the ball gets through. Who would argue its not a TD when literally everyone saw the pylon glow green on the QB tush push?
It’s inexcusable that this sort of thing does not exist in the modern nfl.
Also, make it so playclock hitting 0 automatically invokes a penalty. No more refs guessing.
Refs have way too much power and control and are doing a crap job with it.
For one, penalties need to be challengable/reviewable.
A rule change I think must be implemented is tracking chips in the balls. The technology is there. There is no reason professional football should be guessing the spot of the ball, especially in a pile.
Give the goal line pylons as well as the line to gain markers trackers that detect when the ball passes through them. Hell, give them lights that light up for all to see when the ball gets through. Who would argue its not a TD when literally everyone saw the pylon glow green on the QB tush push?
It’s inexcusable that this sort of thing does not exist in the modern nfl.
Also, make it so playclock hitting 0 automatically invokes a penalty. No more refs guessing.
Refs have way too much power and control and are doing a crap job with it.
-
GreatTimes
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
- Reputation: 381
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
"A rule change I think must be implemented is tracking chips in the balls. The technology is there. There is no reason professional football should be guessing the spot of the ball, especially in a pile."
When did a knee or elbow hit the ground. That is still up to the refs to determine. A chip in the ball doesn't change that.
When did a knee or elbow hit the ground. That is still up to the refs to determine. A chip in the ball doesn't change that.
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
Dude everytime he plays we win!Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:44 pmI’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread
This is true. “Trask played well.”Obsolete wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 7:26 pmDude everytime he plays we win!Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:44 pm
I’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
