The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:37 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:36 pm

WR then becomes a really early priority on draft night.
Good.
Lot of holes on defense, man.
Snake
Posts: 19009
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 6825

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Grahamburn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:54 pm Can we not afford luxury? There’s no one else to sign.
It comes down to price (and preparing accordingly). if he comes back for cheap, I still wouldn’t put myself in a position to depend on him.

Don’t get me wrong, I love the guy. On the field, off the field. Him playing for another team is gonna fucking suck. especially if he’s still able to produce.

It’s just a matter of probabilities and roster construction at this point.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:54 pm
Bootz wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:37 pm

Good.
Lot of holes on defense, man.
McMillan is here.


Defense needs a shot in the arm and a more veteran presence. FA should be used to fill the defense and not with Jordan Whitehead types.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 5441
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 3804
Location: West Coast

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Cheb »

Godwin has the option of being resigned to a reasonable deal. Y'all acting like we had to franchise him or let him go.

If Godwin wants to do that, I'd welcome him back. But if he wants to go elsewhere and chase the money, I wish him well. He's the second best receiver in Bucs history, imo, and I would gladly buy him a beer, thank him for playing for the Bucs, and talk ball anytime.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 7603
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 2424

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

All those things are possible.

I can see LVD retiring, JTS and Godwin going elsewhere. I can also see anyone of them or even all three back when the dust settles. It's the offseason.

As long as LVD doesn't go elsewhere I'm good.
Image
Phantom
Posts: 12422
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 2800

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

I believe Trask will be back if we don’t get a quarterback from free agency or the draft.
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:54 pm Can we not afford luxury? There’s no one else to sign.
The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

WR A:

34 catches, 525 yards, 1 TD

WR B:

37 catches, 461 yards, 8 TDs
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Primeminister wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:54 pm Can we not afford luxury? There’s no one else to sign.
The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
There are only so many picks.

You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.

Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.

I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:52 pm WR A:

34 catches, 525 yards, 1 TD

WR B:

37 catches, 461 yards, 8 TDs
Godwin and McMillan’s rookie seasons. What do I win?
acmillis
Posts: 3775
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:47 pm
Reputation: 1601

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by acmillis »

If Godwin signs elsewhere, we will probably get a third or fourth round comp pick
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

acmillis wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:32 am If Godwin signs elsewhere, we will probably get a third or fourth round comp pick
Assuming we don’t sign anyone else. If you aren’t signing Godwin I’d hope it’s because you’re going after a big free agent on defense.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am
Bootz wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:52 pm WR A:

34 catches, 525 yards, 1 TD

WR B:

37 catches, 461 yards, 8 TDs
Godwin and McMillan’s rookie seasons. What do I win?
Right. We did fine developing a young Chris Godwin into the player he is now. Surely our FO has confidence Jalen McMillan can follow in his footsteps.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am
Primeminister wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pm

The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
There are only so many picks.

You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.

Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.

I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
You make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:52 am
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am

There are only so many picks.

You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.

Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.

I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
You make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.
Trades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.

I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am
Primeminister wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:47 pm

The only options aren’t to sign Godwin or the field. We can draft a good WR who is younger, healthier and cheaper. Paying Godwin at this point is bad business.
There are only so many picks.

You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.

Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.

I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.

You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:15 am
Bootz wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:52 am

You make it sound as if we’re hamstrung into signing Godwin. There’s free agency. Trades. Moving back in the draft to accumulate more picks. So many options to fill the roster. You don’t have to force yourself into re-signing an oft injured WR to a 3rd large deal.
Trades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.

I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
It took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:32 am
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:25 am

There are only so many picks.

You let Godwin go you’ve got McMillan and Mike entering the last year of his contract. That’s about it.

Assuming he’s healthy I know what I have in Godwin.

I don’t know what I have in a rookie WR and I also give up the opportunity cost of drafting someone for the defense.
“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.

You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
He's not even 29 yet. No reason? There are all kinds of reasons. Great player. Great person. Great teammate. We started Sterling Shephard all year so the WR room needs depth regardless. Several teams have 2 WRs making good money. It's not a cost issue.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:33 am
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:15 am

Trades cost picks. Moving back costs position and they're already picking 19th. Who are the better free agents available at WR? He's #2 on every single list I've seen. Higgins will certainly demand much more $$.

I can't really argue with oft-injured and they're leg injuries to boot. He seemed very much over the ACL though.
It took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?
He still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.

I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:37 am
Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:32 am

“Assuming he is healthy”…he isn’t. That part of the sentence cancels out the “known quantity” of Godwin. If he wants the value he held before injury we need to send him on his way.

You never know what you have in a rookie, but that is no reason to hold on to an injured and aging star.
He's not even 29 yet. No reason? There are all kinds of reasons. Great player. Great person. Great teammate. We started Sterling Shephard all year so the WR room needs depth regardless. Several teams have 2 WRs making good money. It's not a cost issue.
It is a cost issue when that #2 receiver is as often injured as Godwin. Add in the fact that his style of play, while electric, lends him to increased injuries going forward. If Godwin is not playing the same style of play he is less valuable to us, but if he plays the style we love is less available to us (due to injury).
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:41 am
Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:33 am

It took 2 years to get over the last leg injury. Are you willing to sacrifice the next 2 years and significant cap space to resign this oft injured WR?
He still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.

I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
I think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:43 am
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:41 am

He still had over 1,000 yards in 2022 and played in all but one game that year and all of them in 2023.

I'd factor the injuries and missed games into any negotiations. All of those things apply to any other teams looking to sign him too. What's his market?
I think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).
He was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.

But, we'll see what they do.
Four Verticals
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:37 am
Reputation: 249

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Four Verticals »

Phantom wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:38 pm I believe Trask will be back if we don’t get a quarterback from free agency or the draft.
Well....thank goodness for this. :lol:
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Four Verticals wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:22 pm
Phantom wrote: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:38 pm I believe Trask will be back if we don’t get a quarterback from free agency or the draft.
Well....thank goodness for this. :lol:
I’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Whats the argument here? That we can't afford to draft a WR in the 2nd, 3rd or 4th round so we have to pay Chris Godwin?
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:56 pm Whats the argument here? That we can't afford to draft a WR in the 2nd, 3rd or 4th round so we have to pay Chris Godwin?
There are all kinds of arguments and scenarios. I think the road to a better roster in 2025 and beyond includes Chris Godwin. You don't. That's ok. Neither of us get to choose.

You can sign Godwin and still draft another WR in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th round.
Primeminister
Posts: 7607
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 3025

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Primeminister »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:47 am
Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:43 am

I think it boils down to believing it’s easier to hit on a WR in the draft than it is for other positions. I believe our cap should be spent elsewhere unless we are getting a home run hit like Tyreek (not happening, but we can dream).
He was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.

But, we'll see what they do.
He was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.
User avatar
BucsNBills
Posts: 3679
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 1186

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

We actually get 2025 cap relief by re-signing Godwin.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.

The New Union will correct that mistake.
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:03 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:47 am

He was 6th in yards per game in 2024. You're not getting that from a rookie. Hill was 30th.

But, we'll see what they do.
He was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.
Fair enough. If you're going into free agency and only signing players who've never had injuries your list will be pretty small.

And to @BucsNBills point if they can get him signed before 2/20 they'd slow his void money down.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 17107
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 5458
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:23 pm
Primeminister wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:03 pm

He was also healthy which he isn’t now. We disagree on paying an injury prone WR is all.
Fair enough. If you're going into free agency and only signing players who've never had injuries your list will be pretty small.

And to @BucsNBills point if they can get him signed before 2/20 they'd slow his void money down.
There's a 0% chance of him being re-signed by February 20th. I explained that last week, doing that with void years only pushes that eventual hit down the line and increases it substantially. We aren't doing that and we shouldn't.
Most hated man in America.
Nobody
Posts: 1125
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:49 pm
Reputation: 1472

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Nobody »

I'm not here to have an opinion on signing or drafting injury-prone players. I was a huge advocate of drafting AWJr due to his on-field attributes, but his injury history was a concern. Despite the concern, I was a big proponent of drafting him. He got dinged a little in year 2 and year 3 and year 5 (last year) was a calamity for him regarding injuries (I would bet he was playing waaaaay below 100 % in that playoff game). So those concerns are starting to mount there.

However, just like it is enormously difficult to replace an enormously versatile FS with the extraordinary football instincts, top shelf read & react, omnidirectional mobility, and willingness physically, same can be said for a WR like Godwin. The league has a dearth of players who check all the following boxes:

* Route running savant across the whole tree.
* Tackle breaker in tiny-space.
* Catch-point dominator.
* Heady in sight adjust against blitz.
* Dominator in the running game.

So, yeah. Injuries mounting. But if that physical checks out (and ankle injury recovery is crazy these days), and you don't sign him...these guys don't grow on trees. Coen had to significantly change the offense without Godwin (he did...but having both approaches of "Before/After Godwin" would be pretty great).

The only possible solve here would be to turn White into a gadget player that sees the field in abundance and eats up a lot of that Godwin territory. He certainly can't win all the ways Godwin does (that 1st and 3rd bullet point aren't in play), but he can absolutely do a chunk of that work (while being an asset/weapon in 21 personnel as the Orbit/Jet player).
Sdbucs
Posts: 1637
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 585

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Sdbucs »

The widespread claims of Chiefs getting calls is a serious issue for the NFL that can’t be ignored. It’s not some fringe conspiracy, is the mainstream stance of many fans in the NFL. The integrity of the game cannot be in question or it all falls apart. Goodell needs to take action this offseason.

For one, penalties need to be challengable/reviewable.

A rule change I think must be implemented is tracking chips in the balls. The technology is there. There is no reason professional football should be guessing the spot of the ball, especially in a pile.

Give the goal line pylons as well as the line to gain markers trackers that detect when the ball passes through them. Hell, give them lights that light up for all to see when the ball gets through. Who would argue its not a TD when literally everyone saw the pylon glow green on the QB tush push?

It’s inexcusable that this sort of thing does not exist in the modern nfl.

Also, make it so playclock hitting 0 automatically invokes a penalty. No more refs guessing.

Refs have way too much power and control and are doing a crap job with it.
GreatTimes
Posts: 1555
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
Reputation: 381

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by GreatTimes »

"A rule change I think must be implemented is tracking chips in the balls. The technology is there. There is no reason professional football should be guessing the spot of the ball, especially in a pile."

When did a knee or elbow hit the ground. That is still up to the refs to determine. A chip in the ball doesn't change that.
Obsolete
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 3:19 pm
Reputation: 446

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Obsolete »

Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:44 pm
Four Verticals wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:22 pm

Well....thank goodness for this. :lol:
I’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
Dude everytime he plays we win!
Grahamburn
Posts: 8989
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 3411

Re: The Official 2025 Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Obsolete wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2025 7:26 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:44 pm

I’d think Trask would try to go to a QB needy team to compete to start.
Dude everytime he plays we win!
This is true. “Trask played well.”
Post Reply