Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Ok we won, but not everyone is happy about how we looked.
What went right? What went wrong?
What can we expect from this secondary going forward?
Is the offense broken?
Was this a coming out party for JTS?
These are some of the questions fans would like to know. If you have some analysis to add please do. If you’ve found good analysis from someone else share their work. Let’s learn, people!!
What went right? What went wrong?
What can we expect from this secondary going forward?
Is the offense broken?
Was this a coming out party for JTS?
These are some of the questions fans would like to know. If you have some analysis to add please do. If you’ve found good analysis from someone else share their work. Let’s learn, people!!
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
- Defense5599
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:28 pm
- Reputation: 219
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Those numbers remind me a lot of the Dolphins in the 80s and early 90s with Dan Marino at QB. They'll win games but they won't go far in the playoffs.
2022 BucZone Survivor League Champion
2022 BZ Bounce Back Survivor League Champion
2022 BZ Bounce Back Survivor League Champion
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
This won’t continue. The secondary is depleted to the point of not being the same team at all. Once players or back and/or those replacements play better we will see that percentage plummet.Defense5599 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 10:43 am Those numbers remind me a lot of the Dolphins in the 80s and early 90s with Dan Marino at QB. They'll win games but they won't go far in the playoffs.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
We moved up two spots in rushing. Yaaaay!
-
Pirate Life
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:45 am
- Reputation: 1403
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Game was in a downpour. Teasing out Passing offense and defense signal isn’t going to yield a whole lot.
I’m mostly interested in what Bowles called. Looked to be a ton of overload blitz and Stunt + 2nd level blitz which is perfect for this game.
After I look into that I’ll throw out what I find.
Like I said in general chat, this sort of back 5/6 clustereff of personnel loss will force Bowles to call games extremely well (and aggressively). I have a funny feeling that we may be surprised at how well the defense plays because of that.
I’m mostly interested in what Bowles called. Looked to be a ton of overload blitz and Stunt + 2nd level blitz which is perfect for this game.
After I look into that I’ll throw out what I find.
Like I said in general chat, this sort of back 5/6 clustereff of personnel loss will force Bowles to call games extremely well (and aggressively). I have a funny feeling that we may be surprised at how well the defense plays because of that.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8989
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3411
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
I’m all for aggressive defensive play calling, which worked well in some cases against the Pats. It also yielded 19 straight completions.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Although Bucs weren't successful in stopping many of Mac's passes, looking at this chart, it looks like he concentrated in the middle of the field, which is where he also had the most incompletions. Was this part of Bowles strategy to flood the middle? This passing pattern is very similar to his previous three weeks.Nobody wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 6:50 pm Game was in a downpour. Teasing out Passing offense and defense signal isn’t going to yield a whole lot.
I’m mostly interested in what Bowles called. Looked to be a ton of overload blitz and Stunt + 2nd level blitz which is perfect for this game.
After I look into that I’ll throw out what I find.
Like I said in general chat, this sort of back 5/6 clustereff of personnel loss will force Bowles to call games extremely well (and aggressively). I have a funny feeling that we may be surprised at how well the defense plays because of that.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
That is the problem with that approach in a downpour.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 10:12 am I’m all for aggressive defensive play calling, which worked well in some cases against the Pats. It also yielded 19 straight completions.
* Brady missed 4 throws badly (3 of which should have been big gains).
* He put a back shoulder Fade on Mike where Mike either couldn't stop and make the play or there was miscommunication.
* He put a ball on Brate for a big catch and run that Brate dropped.
* He put two dimes on Brown at the end (one he failed to track - lights? - and the other he just dropped).
The downfield passing game was a mess (that is 8 throws that should have been completed for huge gains/TDs).
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Overwhelmingly this spread was a function of the following things:AJPG wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 11:30 amAlthough Bucs weren't successful in stopping many of Mac's passes, looking at this chart, it looks like he concentrated in the middle of the field, which is where he also had the most incompletions. Was this part of Bowles strategy to flood the middle? This passing pattern is very similar to his previous three weeks.Nobody wrote: ↑Tue Oct 05, 2021 6:50 pm Game was in a downpour. Teasing out Passing offense and defense signal isn’t going to yield a whole lot.
I’m mostly interested in what Bowles called. Looked to be a ton of overload blitz and Stunt + 2nd level blitz which is perfect for this game.
After I look into that I’ll throw out what I find.
Like I said in general chat, this sort of back 5/6 clustereff of personnel loss will force Bowles to call games extremely well (and aggressively). I have a funny feeling that we may be surprised at how well the defense plays because of that.
pass-chart_JON586540_2021-REG-4_1633319040754.jpeg
* Overload blitz/blitz + stunt/Barret or Tryon Pass Rush Wins.
* Absolute downpour incentivizing checkdowns (they were specifically working layers/high-lows over the middle...Pats staple).
* We played about 67 % Zone coverage behind those overload blitzes/blitz + stunt. The Zone coverage was actually very solid (but, again, this is condition-context dependent...you're not challenged as much in a downpour with a lot of blitzes causing the ball to come out quickly to checkdowns). Winfield, Cockrell, Davis all had very good games and Sherman gave up a lot of catches and had the call go against him but, given the circumstances, I'll call his play a win.
* We missed some tackles (surely, in part, due to the conditions) and had some pursuit angle issues.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
- King Bootz
- Posts: 10655
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
- Reputation: -632
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
I gave this a like because these guys correctly identified the play of the game.
That said, my GOD! Their incessant whining about how the officiating was unfair only for the Bucs is too much.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Thank you! The officiating was utter trash, but that was too much bitching.King Bootz wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 12:19 pmI gave this a like because these guys correctly identified the play of the game.
That said, my GOD! Their incessant whining about how the officiating was unfair only for the Bucs is too much.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Like I said prior, I don't think there is any point in evaluating the passing game in this one. It was a complete downpour. The idea that the passing game is going to be remotely sharp (particularly intermediate + throws) in a complete downpour is a difficult position to take seriously.
The only real bad play that I saw in the review of the tape was the high/low read over the middle where Brady threw to Mike very early in the game. He had an under that was open because of Mike's route. He should have come off of Mike and thrown that. The throw to Mike there was a Winston-like play.
As far as the Deep Hook the guy above was analyzing. That wasn't a misread. Mike is "open" against an outside leverage defender with no under support. If the ball is out, on time, and the throw is low and well to the inside (he had room all the way to the hash), its a relatively straight-forward hook-up (bare minimum, the ball placement can put the throw out of danger and give only Mike the ability to make a play on it). Brady makes that connection routinely if it isn't a downpour.
++++++++++++
As far as the officiating goes, it was awful for both teams. Truly terrible. There were so many calls missed both ways that its difficult to say what the game would have looked like with zero officiating errors.
*****************
As far as defense goes, Tryon and Barrett both had fantastic games. If I do any breakdowns (probably not given its Friday), that is where it will be.
Tryon's Win Rate wasn't as good as Shaq's (Shaq won on around 20 % of his snaps...which is excellent), but his Win Rate was solid and when he did Win it was the kind of devastating win that wrecked a play.
The only real bad play that I saw in the review of the tape was the high/low read over the middle where Brady threw to Mike very early in the game. He had an under that was open because of Mike's route. He should have come off of Mike and thrown that. The throw to Mike there was a Winston-like play.
As far as the Deep Hook the guy above was analyzing. That wasn't a misread. Mike is "open" against an outside leverage defender with no under support. If the ball is out, on time, and the throw is low and well to the inside (he had room all the way to the hash), its a relatively straight-forward hook-up (bare minimum, the ball placement can put the throw out of danger and give only Mike the ability to make a play on it). Brady makes that connection routinely if it isn't a downpour.
++++++++++++
As far as the officiating goes, it was awful for both teams. Truly terrible. There were so many calls missed both ways that its difficult to say what the game would have looked like with zero officiating errors.
*****************
As far as defense goes, Tryon and Barrett both had fantastic games. If I do any breakdowns (probably not given its Friday), that is where it will be.
Tryon's Win Rate wasn't as good as Shaq's (Shaq won on around 20 % of his snaps...which is excellent), but his Win Rate was solid and when he did Win it was the kind of devastating win that wrecked a play.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
First and last sack he’s given up was the play he got flipped by Mack. One year ago.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Wirfs has been incredible (the tape doesn't lie).
But don't think that having Tom Brady as his QB isn't a huge part of this.
Imagine being Andrew Thomas or Mekhi Becton and playing OT for Sackfests R Us Hold the Ball and "What is Pre-Snap Mental Processing?" NYG and NYJ QBed teams.
The Pressure Numbers given up and the Time to Throw numbers by the Bucs OL under JW vs TB are staggeringly different. Sacks are a QB stat (and a huge amount of Pressures are as well).
But don't think that having Tom Brady as his QB isn't a huge part of this.
Imagine being Andrew Thomas or Mekhi Becton and playing OT for Sackfests R Us Hold the Ball and "What is Pre-Snap Mental Processing?" NYG and NYJ QBed teams.
The Pressure Numbers given up and the Time to Throw numbers by the Bucs OL under JW vs TB are staggeringly different. Sacks are a QB stat (and a huge amount of Pressures are as well).
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
Yeap. I think Brady pushes the lineman he plays with up a tier just because he gets rid of he ball so quickly. He can make a below average lineman look average, average look good, etc.Nobody wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 12:10 am Wirfs has been incredible (the tape doesn't lie).
But don't think that having Tom Brady as his QB isn't a huge part of this.
Imagine being Andrew Thomas or Mekhi Becton and playing OT for Sackfests R Us Hold the Ball and "What is Pre-Snap Mental Processing?" NYG and NYJ QBed teams.
The Pressure Numbers given up and the Time to Throw numbers by the Bucs OL under JW vs TB are staggeringly different. Sacks are a QB stat (and a huge amount of Pressures are as well).
Hell we all thought Smith was going to get Brady killed but for the most part he's looked really solid, and I think a lot of that has to do with Brady.
I'm not sure where Brady would rank but he has to be hear the top of fastest average snap to throw timing.
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
# 2 in the NFL.ATrain wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:52 amYeap. I think Brady pushes the lineman he plays with up a tier just because he gets rid of he ball so quickly. He can make a below average lineman look average, average look good, etc.Nobody wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 12:10 am Wirfs has been incredible (the tape doesn't lie).
But don't think that having Tom Brady as his QB isn't a huge part of this.
Imagine being Andrew Thomas or Mekhi Becton and playing OT for Sackfests R Us Hold the Ball and "What is Pre-Snap Mental Processing?" NYG and NYJ QBed teams.
The Pressure Numbers given up and the Time to Throw numbers by the Bucs OL under JW vs TB are staggeringly different. Sacks are a QB stat (and a huge amount of Pressures are as well).
Hell we all thought Smith was going to get Brady killed but for the most part he's looked really solid, and I think a lot of that has to do with Brady.
I'm not sure where Brady would rank but he has to be hear the top of fastest average snap to throw timing.
And that is with the most vertical offense (concept-wise) in the entire NFL.
Let that sink in.
-
Primeminister
- Posts: 7608
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 3025
Re: Bucs vs Pats Game Analysis
That goes against all conventional wisdom.Nobody wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 9:02 am# 2 in the NFL.ATrain wrote: ↑Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:52 am
Yeap. I think Brady pushes the lineman he plays with up a tier just because he gets rid of he ball so quickly. He can make a below average lineman look average, average look good, etc.
Hell we all thought Smith was going to get Brady killed but for the most part he's looked really solid, and I think a lot of that has to do with Brady.
I'm not sure where Brady would rank but he has to be hear the top of fastest average snap to throw timing.
And that is with the most vertical offense (concept-wise) in the entire NFL.
Let that sink in.

