Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1002

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Grahamburn »

Sdbucs wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:47 pm C.Otton is trash

TE is one of our weakest positions.
Trash seems a touch harsh. I’d love to see one of you dorks call these guys “trash” to their face.

He’s an average NFL tight end, which is to say, he’s a lot better than “trash.”
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

Sdbucs wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:47 pm C.Otton is trash

TE is one of our weakest positions.
"Just be patient"

I'm sure he'll become......something....
Most hated man in America.
Sdbucs
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 266

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Sdbucs »

Grahamburn wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:52 pm
Sdbucs wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:47 pm C.Otton is trash

TE is one of our weakest positions.
Trash seems a touch harsh. I’d love to see one of you dorks call these guys “trash” to their face.

He’s an average NFL tight end, which is to say, he’s a lot better than “trash.”
PFF had Cotton at #43 TE in 2023 regular season. Teams literally had multiple TEs better than him on their roster. That is TRASH.

And yes the internet is a tool that lets people make points without getting their face blasted in. He seems like a great guy but he’s not the answer at TE
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4483
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1144

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Doctor »

mdb1958 wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 11:12 am
Grahamburn wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 10:57 am

I don’t think Bowers gets past the Colts.
Doc flip floppin all off season on his 1st pick wishlist.
I mean a stacked class will do that but I think I have made my shortlist clear, with Bowers being in the "long gone" list.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

Sdbucs wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 7:29 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:52 pm

Trash seems a touch harsh. I’d love to see one of you dorks call these guys “trash” to their face.

He’s an average NFL tight end, which is to say, he’s a lot better than “trash.”
PFF had Cotton at #43 TE in 2023 regular season. Teams literally had multiple TEs better than him on their roster. That is TRASH.

And yes the internet is a tool that lets people make points without getting their face blasted in. He seems like a great guy but he’s not the answer at TE
Cotton is trash to anyone who knows what they are seeing. All Graham sees is rainbows, sunshine, and rose colors behind those shades he has superglued to his face. He thinks the fact that he chooses not to view this team objectively makes him a superfan.
Most hated man in America.
Phantom
Posts: 7054
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1209

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Phantom »

I don't think Graham fully understands the meaning of average. Our wide receiver group, with the exception of Evans and Godwin and our tight end group are both TERRIBLE.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3833
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2434
Location: West Coast

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Cheb »

Phantom wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 8:40 pm I don't think Graham fully understands the meaning of average. Our wide receiver group, with the exception of Evans and Godwin and our tight end group are both TERRIBLE.
Excluding the top two receivers from most teams leaves the cupboard pretty bare, my dude.

The best passing team in the league by yardage last year, the Dolphins, if forced to play without their top two guys in Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle, are trotting out Braxton Berrios and I don't even know who. The rest of their receivers are dog water.

We could do this for the number 2 team as well to prove it ain't a fluke. Take away their top two guys in Amon-Ra St Brown and Sam LaPorta, and Jared Goff is now looking far more pedestrian slinging it to Josh Reynolds and Kalif Raymond as his first and second options.

You can keep going down the list of NFL teams, and it doesn't get much better.

---

I digress. I'd argue that Cade Otton is a good young tight end, and Trey Palmer is pretty good. Moreover, I think we shouldn't overlook Raashad Whites's capacity as a receiver.

There are only so many balls to go around a game. The median number of passing attempts per game in the NFL last year was around 34. Looking at last year's data, Mike averages exactly 8 targets a game, Chris had near as many, so that's damn near half your passing targets per game just with those two guys. Palmer, White, and Otton averaged about 4 targets per game apiece, rounding them out to 12.

Assuming we have similar useage this season, that's 30 of our 34 pass attempts per game with just those five guys, the other four went to miscellaneous players.

I say all that to ask the following questions. Firstly, if we add a theoretical tight end or receiver, whose targets and balls is he taking? Secondly, would shifting those targets to a rookie make much of a difference in our end of season record?
Image
Big Irv
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:56 pm
Reputation: 68

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Big Irv »

PFF’s 43rd ranking is trash. He is a serviceable TE. An upgrade would be nice, but it’s certainly not a priority. Especially since he’s still on his rookie deal.
Image
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Big Irv wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:48 am PFF’s 43rd ranking is trash. He is a serviceable TE. An upgrade would be nice, but it’s certainly not a priority. Especially since he’s still on his rookie deal.
THANK YOU FOR USING COMMON SENSE. 2 TE's in the top 100!
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Grahamburn wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:52 pm
Sdbucs wrote: Sat Apr 20, 2024 6:47 pm C.Otton is trash

TE is one of our weakest positions.
Trash seems a touch harsh. I’d love to see one of you dorks call these guys “trash” to their face.

He’s an average NFL tight end, which is to say, he’s a lot better than “trash.”
Would he have been better if he was blessed with forty more targets from Evans and Godwin..
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Durham needs to start his stats and Taula needs to replace Wells.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

mdb1958 wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:57 am Durham needs to start his stats and Taula needs to replace Wells.
Durham looks like he's running with bricks in his shoes. Doubt he ever becomes a reliable weapon.
Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:10 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:57 am Durham needs to start his stats and Taula needs to replace Wells.
Durham looks like he's running with bricks in his shoes. Doubt he ever becomes a reliable weapon.
Didnt we do two picks to get Durham?
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

mdb1958 wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:37 pm
Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:10 pm

Durham looks like he's running with bricks in his shoes. Doubt he ever becomes a reliable weapon.
Didnt we do two picks to get Durham?
We gave a 7th to the Rams to move up 4 spots.
Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:47 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 2:37 pm

Didnt we do two picks to get Durham?
We gave a 7th to the Rams to move up 4 spots.


So thats 4 picks for 2 contracted TE's.
GreatTimes
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
Reputation: 217

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by GreatTimes »

The Bucs need to find a college basketball power forward that they can convert to a TE.
Obsolete
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 3:19 pm
Reputation: 184

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Obsolete »

mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

I guess they didnt hear me.
Sdbucs
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 266

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Sdbucs »

If you had Evan Engram but every other team had a Gronk clone, would you say your team is lacking at TE?

Yes.

Just because Cotton isn’t making outwardly bad plays or mistakes doesn’t mean that he is significantly worse than league standards. Again, PFF shows 40+ TEs performing at a higher level than him. To win in the NFL you have to be better than your opponents, not just be “good enough”.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

GreatTimes wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:26 pm The Bucs need to find a college basketball power forward that they can convert to a TE.
Not sure a 6'9 to 6'11 guy is gonna do well at the NFL level. Unless the plan is just to use him for jump balls in the endzone.
Most hated man in America.
GreatTimes
Posts: 921
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
Reputation: 217

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by GreatTimes »

Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:57 pm
GreatTimes wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:26 pm The Bucs need to find a college basketball power forward that they can convert to a TE.
Not sure a 6'9 to 6'11 guy is gonna do well at the NFL level. Unless the plan is just to use him for jump balls in the endzone.
Tony Gonzalez
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

GreatTimes wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:55 pm
Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:57 pm

Not sure a 6'9 to 6'11 guy is gonna do well at the NFL level. Unless the plan is just to use him for jump balls in the endzone.
Tony Gonzalez


All our TE's are taller than Gonzalez.
CannonFire
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 189

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by CannonFire »

I don't have a real issue with Otton or Kieft from an offensive stance. Our WR's and TE's are a product of the system and the execution of it, be it the game plan, game calling, and QB. I think Otton is ok enough to not have to invest a draft pick in one, unless a great option that's too good to pass up. Kieft was brought in to be a blocker, not a pass catcher. Anything he gives us there, should be considered a bonus. That said, I don't think he's all that good of a blocker, so upgrading him is fine, but with the holes we need filled, I can't see a justification of using one of our first 5 picks on a TE to upgrade him... this year.

Players I'm ok with at the draft spot to upgrade Otton or Kieft:
#26 - Brock Bowers
#89/92 - Ja'Tavion Sanders
#125 - Cade Stover/Theo Johnson
#220 - Tip Reiman
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2095
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 602

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Selmon Rules »

GreatTimes wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:55 pm
Bootz wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:57 pm

Not sure a 6'9 to 6'11 guy is gonna do well at the NFL level. Unless the plan is just to use him for jump balls in the endzone.
Tony Gonzalez
Add: Antonio Gates

TE is not a position that cost is wins in 2023.... It could be argued that IOL and edge did
Image
Big Irv
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:56 pm
Reputation: 68

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Big Irv »

Sdbucs wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:57 pm If you had Evan Engram but every other team had a Gronk clone, would you say your team is lacking at TE?

Yes.

Just because Cotton isn’t making outwardly bad plays or mistakes doesn’t mean that he is significantly worse than league standards. Again, PFF shows 40+ TEs performing at a higher level than him. To win in the NFL you have to be better than your opponents, not just be “good enough”.
Otton was 21st in the NFL among TEs, with 67 targets.
21st in receptions with 47
21st in yards with 455
Tied for 12th in touchdowns with 4

I don’t know where PFF got 43 from, but I’d say he’s somewhere around the 21st best TE.

On top of that, he is 76th among TEs in yearly salary at $1,130,985. So, if I were the Bucs, I wouldn’t expend too many resources on his replacement.
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1002

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Grahamburn »

Big Irv wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2024 4:56 pm
Sdbucs wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 5:57 pm If you had Evan Engram but every other team had a Gronk clone, would you say your team is lacking at TE?

Yes.

Just because Cotton isn’t making outwardly bad plays or mistakes doesn’t mean that he is significantly worse than league standards. Again, PFF shows 40+ TEs performing at a higher level than him. To win in the NFL you have to be better than your opponents, not just be “good enough”.
Otton was 21st in the NFL among TEs, with 67 targets.
21st in receptions with 47
21st in yards with 455
Tied for 12th in touchdowns with 4

I don’t know where PFF got 43 from, but I’d say he’s somewhere around the 21st best TE.

On top of that, he is 76th among TEs in yearly salary at $1,130,985. So, if I were the Bucs, I wouldn’t expend too many resources on his replacement.
He struggled as a blocker last year.
Otton regressed as a run blocker according to Pro Football Focus, earning a grade of 50 last year after a 58.8 grade as a rookie. He fared even worse as a pass protector with a 44.9 PFF grade after posting a 78.3 grade as a rookie. Otton intends to hit the weight room this offseason to help get stronger at the point of attack on the line of scrimmage.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3833
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2434
Location: West Coast

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Cheb »

I mean, Cade certainly is no Gronkowski when it comes to the blocking game, but I can't recall thinking that he was torpedoing our running attack.
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1002

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Grahamburn »

Cheb wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2024 5:56 pm I mean, Cade certainly is no Gronkowski when it comes to the blocking game, but I can't recall thinking that he was torpedoing our running attack.
Group effort.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6345
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1628
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Bootz »

Cheb wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2024 5:56 pm I mean, Cade certainly is no Gronkowski when it comes to the blocking game, but I can't recall thinking that he was torpedoing our running attack.
No that was the IOLs doing.
Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

What grade did PFF give Otton and Durham for their last year in college? It could be useful for looking at this years crop.
Sdbucs
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 266

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Sdbucs »

Otton

2021 - 65.8 (TE #41)
2020 - 82.4 (TE #12)
2019 - 73.2
2018 - 75.9

Durham
2022 - 67.7 (TE #37)
2021 - 68.1 (TE #33)
2020 - 48.8
2019 - 61.9


Cottons 2020 peak would have him at TE #5 this year in the draft.

Kincaid was a 91, Mayer a 92.5 last year.

Trey McBride a 94.8

Kyle Pitts a 95.7

Bowers an 85.9 this year. PFF shows Harold Fannin Jr. out of Bowling Green as #1 at 89.8 in 2023

Bowers:

2023 - 85.9 - #3
2022 - 81.7 - #5
2021 - 91.9 - #3
Sdbucs
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 266

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Sdbucs »

Per PFF the 2023 TE draft class is awful with the exception of Bowers.
mdb1958
Posts: 7593
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 49

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by mdb1958 »

Wow, you probably have ASJ's score.
Jonny
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:34 pm
Reputation: 286

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Jonny »

Cheb wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2024 1:36 am
I digress. I'd argue that Cade Otton is a good young tight end, and Trey Palmer is pretty good. Moreover, I think we shouldn't overlook Raashad Whites's capacity as a receiver.

There are only so many balls to go around a game. The median number of passing attempts per game in the NFL last year was around 34. Looking at last year's data, Mike averages exactly 8 targets a game, Chris had near as many, so that's damn near half your passing targets per game just with those two guys. Palmer, White, and Otton averaged about 4 targets per game apiece, rounding them out to 12.

Assuming we have similar useage this season, that's 30 of our 34 pass attempts per game with just those five guys, the other four went to miscellaneous players.

I say all that to ask the following questions. Firstly, if we add a theoretical tight end or receiver, whose targets and balls is he taking? Secondly, would shifting those targets to a rookie make much of a difference in our end of season record?
I agree with most points you have made except for the major one, which is Otton being a "good young TE". For a guy who commits as many errors as he does as a in-line blocker and on screens, for how stiff he is as an athlete in his ability to separate, for how unimpressive his deep speed is, he is a below average starting TE that has only seen as many opportunities as he has because of him being one of the only receiving TE draft picks since 2018.

If Baker, our OC and our O-line are above average, we don't desperately need an upgrade at TE position and can be okay with Otton for another year. But this absolutely is a better offense with a better athlete like Ben Sinnott getting 50-75% snaps that Otton does even as a rookie. A good example is Texans offense from last season. Dalton Schultz was as important as any of their talented young perimeter receivers last season in making their offense deadly.

To Otton's defense, he is a football player. He is adept at taking advantage of what ever ounce of athleticism he has. OJ Howard was much more an athlete, a projection, that always looked awkward playing football even when he had productive games early in his career. That is why there is a certain type of TE I'd be happy with Bucs drafting and a certain type I'd be scared of. Theo Johnson scares me. Ben Sinnott and Dallin Holker are Otton kind of guys, with Sinnott offering a lot more upside both as a blocker and athlete.
Sdbucs
Posts: 984
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 9:12 pm
Reputation: 266

Re: Evaluating TE going into 2024-2025

Post by Sdbucs »

mdb1958 wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2024 11:19 pm Wow, you probably have ASJ's score.
Unfortunately 2013 is when the NCAA data cuts out

He was a consistent 60s ranked player in the NFL peaking at 76 in 2015 (TE #11) behind Gronk, Eifert, Ertz, Walker, Olson, Graham, Antonio Gates to name a few

Pretty insane year for TEs, 2015

Gronk a consistent 90+ ranked player every season is wild
Post Reply