I'm pretty sure that point was already established.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I'm pretty sure that point was already established.
This would be a friggin' Jedi level troll.
They've built a very interesting group of receivers there to work with Watson:Buc2 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 3:21 pm The Browns officially announced the signing of veteran receiver Marquise Goodwin on Friday.
The deal was originally reported as complete on March 24. That came at the end of a week that started with Goodwin spending two days visiting with the team, but departing without a deal.
How many people did he apologize to in his retirement speech?
There are plenty of Buc fans who grew up on a farm or a ranch who cleaned out the stalls. Those fans know their shit!
Yes, it's crazy that an NFL player actually improved.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:01 pm What a difference a year makes. He looked lost against us in the 2021 playoffs.
Did I say it was crazy that he improved? Whole lot of people around here acting like Baker can't play better or get back to his 2020 levels at minimum though.Bootz wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:04 pmYes, it's crazy that an NFL player actually improved.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:01 pm What a difference a year makes. He looked lost against us in the 2021 playoffs.
Burrow is next in line to get paid. Let's hope Mike Brown isn't still a cheap ass.
Bootz wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:04 pmYes, it's crazy that an NFL player actually improved.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:01 pm What a difference a year makes. He looked lost against us in the 2021 playoffs.
Burrow is next in line to get paid. Let's hope Mike Brown isn't still a cheap ass.
Who's dumb enough to make this point? If Lamar Jackson has only had 1 good year then guys like Herbert, Tua, Murray, Allen, haven't had any.
Why are you so hot and heavy for Lamar Jackson? He's good, but certainly not great. Regardless of anyone's opinion about him, including mine, our thoughts don't amount to a hill of beans. So, you have no need to defend him so vehemently every time someone in here says something even slightly uncomplimentary about him. Just asking so don't go all Bootz on me because I won't respond to that.
Trask is more mobile than people think, but not exactly Canales style mobile. But maybe. He'll have every chance to win the job. If he goes 11/13 199 yards and a TD to Bakers 5/9, I don't think we're going to force things where they shouldn't go.Doctor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:46 pm Trask was a great fit and prospect for the Arians offense. We're no longer running that.
You need to adapt to the changing landscape. He'll have every chance to show his new value in this new regime. But it's stupid to hold the future hostage to the past just to "justify a pick".
The goal should be to find the right QB for this regime, not save face or appease value and hindsight draft groupies.
Because he is great, despite your opinion here. This had more to do though with this fictional story that he's only had 1 good year.Buc2 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:40 amWhy are you so hot and heavy for Lamar Jackson? He's good, but certainly not great. Regardless of anyone's opinion about him, including mine, our thoughts don't amount to a hill of beans. So, you have no need to defend him so vehemently every time someone in here says something even slightly uncomplimentary about him. Just asking so don't go all Bootz on me because I won't respond to that.
Drafting a 2nd round QB to ride the bench is a waste of a pick, haven't you heard?Doctor wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:40 amTrask is more mobile than people think, but not exactly Canales style mobile. But maybe. He'll have every chance to win the job. If he goes 11/13 199 yards and a TD to Bakers 5/9, I don't think we're going to force things where they shouldn't go.Doctor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2023 7:46 pm Trask was a great fit and prospect for the Arians offense. We're no longer running that.
You need to adapt to the changing landscape. He'll have every chance to show his new value in this new regime. But it's stupid to hold the future hostage to the past just to "justify a pick".
The goal should be to find the right QB for this regime, not save face or appease value and hindsight draft groupies.
But on the surface, the offense does seem to lend itself more for to the talents and skillsets that made Baker a top pick. Talent wise I don't think it's hard to argue Baker.
It's going to come down to processing and mastering the offense. We could still draft a guy too. Hooker in the second, sitting a year behind Baker in a Canales offense could be something. There are a lot of stones to overturn here.
The 49ers have received trade inquiries for QB Trey Lance, per @nflnetwork.
A trade isn’t considered imminent, but there are several teams interested in acquiring Lance.
Throw in D-White. I know the 49ers have zero needs there, but I can't help but think John Lynch would love to add a talent like that cheap. He could probably just use him as a nickel blitzer.
Considering the investment they made if the 49ers are trying to trade him why would we want him? If they're trading him for pennies on the dollar clearly they have realized they've made a big mistake and are trying to salvage something. Would be dumb of us to oblige.