Akiem Hicks: Signed.

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by King Bootz »

Suh's officially out

uscbucsfan
Posts: 2261
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 1:35 pm
Reputation: 503

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by uscbucsfan »

King Bootz wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:49 pm Suh's officially out

On paper, it appears to be a pretty nice upgrade.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by King Bootz »

uscbucsfan wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:51 pm
King Bootz wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:49 pm Suh's officially out

On paper, it appears to be a pretty nice upgrade.
On paper, yes. Then you read that he's played a total of 29 games over the last 3 years. So health is a major issue with him.
Snake
Posts: 11934
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3232

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Snake »

He was quite a player with the Bears for a while there. Not sure where he is as a 32-year-old, but I’m liking the gamble if he’s healthy. Putting him in rotation with Hall and Co may help him.
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1090

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Grahamburn »

One thing you can’t knock Suh on is durability. Hicks has missed a lot of games lately.

Welcome to Tampa!
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 521

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

This dude is a really good player when he’s healthy. Problem is he isn’t healthy all that often. He’s definitely an upgrade over Suh skill wise at this point in their careers. However, Suh has only missed two games in his entire career and that was back in 2011.
nybf
Posts: 2089
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:41 am
Reputation: -1673

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by nybf »

Is this like when Leftwich was officially gone?
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

Was it injury or the Bears playing different personnel

I like this signing until my vision tells me different. He may play really well with our group.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by King Bootz »

Miller4Prez64 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:06 pm This dude is a really good player when he’s healthy. Problem is he isn’t healthy all that often. He’s definitely an upgrade over Suh skill wise at this point in their careers. However, Suh has only missed two games in his entire career and that was back in 2011.
Suh is definitely an Iron man and should be commended as such. The 2 games you mentioned in 2011 were due to suspension. He's never missed a game due to injury.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by King Bootz »

mdb1958 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:30 pm Was it injury or the Bears playing different personnel

I like this signing until my vision tells me different. He may play really well with our group.
I'm surprised you heard of him. He was drafted.
User avatar
Dread
Posts: 2546
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:56 am
Reputation: 1152
Location: On the golf course

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Dread »

Hicks is one of the most dominant run defenders in the NFL that past few year, but he's had injuries in 2 of the last 3 season and will be 33 this November. Being a power player his age is less of a concern than if he were CB or WR.

When Hicks is healthy he was the engine that made those Bears defenses so good.

Trying to run vs Vea + Hicks seem pretty impossible and will allow Devin White and LVD free to make plays.

My speculation is that Suh wanted to be paid like the guy who played the most snaps of any DLinemen on the team last season and the Bucs viewed Suh as a more of just a run stuffer and liability as a pass rusher.

The Bucs have an elite run defense. But the weakness of the team last season on defense was rushing the QB with only 4. Suh would get single blocked almost everytime on 3rd down and had a pretty poor pressure %.

Hence the drafting of Logan Hall. Who I'd imagine will be that 3rd down pass rusher from the 3T.

Hicks will take the role Suh had on 1st down/2nd down along w/ short yardage. This deal is 'up to $10m' which I'd imagine requires he's healthy and on the active roster to earn that money.
Image
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

King Bootz wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:34 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:30 pm Was it injury or the Bears playing different personnel

I like this signing until my vision tells me different. He may play really well with our group.

I'm surprised you heard of him. He was drafted.

Dude you named yourself after a shoe, surprises should be happening.


Get Lucky and pick up a cut like DeShaan Dixon or Joshua Onujiogu, then were building. Problem is we are way down the waiver even if these guys were cut.
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

Way to get that info out quick Bootz!
These Are The Days
Posts: 2571
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2022 6:01 pm
Reputation: 686

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by These Are The Days »

mdb1958 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:45 pm
King Bootz wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:34 pm


I'm surprised you heard of him. He was drafted.

Dude you named yourself after a shoe, surprises should be happening.


Get Lucky and pick up a cut like DeShaan Dixon or Joshua Onujiogu, then were building. Problem is we are way down the waiver even if these guys were cut.
I was personally hoping for Will Yaligma
User avatar
Redrum
Posts: 350
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 7:45 am
Reputation: 146

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Redrum »

I have watched Hicks dominate guards a few times. He looked better than Mack. If he stays healthy he's a difference maker.

I'll miss Suh. He was a leader and an iron man. Tough as nails. If you're paying 10 million for him or Hicks though I'd take Hicks.
Primeminister
Posts: 5602
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
Reputation: 1930

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Primeminister »

These Are The Days wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 4:25 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 2:45 pm


Dude you named yourself after a shoe, surprises should be happening.


Get Lucky and pick up a cut like DeShaan Dixon or Joshua Onujiogu, then were building. Problem is we are way down the waiver even if these guys were cut.
I was personally hoping for Will Yaligma
Same here. The guy balls out.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3869
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2493
Location: West Coast

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Cheb »

I echo the group sentiment; if he stays healthy, it's a good signing. Potentially did we overpay for him, maybe. Would have to see the contract details.
Image
Kona
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:27 am
Reputation: 533

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Kona »

Bears fans on Reddit are saying we got a really good one (if healthy). Good thing for him is we drafted Hall and I see a healthy rotation to hopefully keep him fresh.
User avatar
Dread
Posts: 2546
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:56 am
Reputation: 1152
Location: On the golf course

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Dread »

Cheb wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 5:01 pm I echo the group sentiment; if he stays healthy, it's a good signing. Potentially did we overpay for him, maybe. Would have to see the contract details.
We'll see how huch is guaranteed like the way Suh demands his salary vs how much is tied to being active on Sundays along with performance incentives.

I'd be surprised if we paid Hicks $10m, or even $9m guaranteed instead of Suh given Suh's reliability and familiarity.
Image
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by MJW »

Hicks is a brick wall against the run. This is a signing that says, "We enjoy teams rushing for 70 YPG against us, and we think we'll keep that going."

Big issue is durability, like someone said. But I think we'll see him rotating with Hall situationally quite a bit, with Hall playing more passing downs and Hicks playing more running downs.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by MJW »

Not sure where this puts us with the cap, but I imagine the Gronk signing is coming soon, and that'll probably be that for name signings. Probably 47-48 of the 53 is basically set, which is pretty much where you want to be as a Superbowl Contender entering OTAs.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3869
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2493
Location: West Coast

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Cheb »

MJW wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 11:35 pm Not sure where this puts us with the cap, but I imagine the Gronk signing is coming soon, and that'll probably be that for name signings. Probably 47-48 of the 53 is basically set, which is pretty much where you want to be as a Superbowl Contender entering OTAs.
I'd agree.

Per Spotrac, we had $12.4 million in cap space in the top 51 before the Nicks signing. Assuming that Nicks' contract is incentive heavy with relatively modest base compensation, we should be able to afford Gronk with maybe one of those how-is-this-even-legal dummy years tacked on to round out his pay.
Image
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by MJW »

Cheb wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:23 am
MJW wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 11:35 pm Not sure where this puts us with the cap, but I imagine the Gronk signing is coming soon, and that'll probably be that for name signings. Probably 47-48 of the 53 is basically set, which is pretty much where you want to be as a Superbowl Contender entering OTAs.
I'd agree.

Per Spotrac, we had $12.4 million in cap space in the top 51 before the Nicks signing. Assuming that Nicks' contract is incentive heavy with relatively modest base compensation, we should be able to afford Gronk with maybe one of those how-is-this-even-legal dummy years tacked on to round out his pay.
Yeah, I could see one more stealth good signing thanks to CAP MAGIC! But once Gronk is back, I don't know that we need one. With Tyler Johnson, Scott Miller, and Jaelen Darden all disappointing last year, and no certainties with Perriman or Grayson, I'd still be talking to veteran receivers. How low would someone like Julio go to chase a ring? How about a flier on...flyer Will Fuller? ETC.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

Hope the old guy can handle Florida heat.
BJJ34
Posts: 1744
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:45 pm
Reputation: 294

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by BJJ34 »

MJW wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:38 am
Cheb wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:23 am

I'd agree.

Per Spotrac, we had $12.4 million in cap space in the top 51 before the Nicks signing. Assuming that Nicks' contract is incentive heavy with relatively modest base compensation, we should be able to afford Gronk with maybe one of those how-is-this-even-legal dummy years tacked on to round out his pay.
Yeah, I could see one more stealth good signing thanks to CAP MAGIC! But once Gronk is back, I don't know that we need one. With Tyler Johnson, Scott Miller, and Jaelen Darden all disappointing last year, and no certainties with Perriman or Grayson, I'd still be talking to veteran receivers. How low would someone like Julio go to chase a ring? How about a flier on...flyer Will Fuller? ETC.
I would not take a flier on any FA receiver given the rookie classes keep outperforming. Maybe not for our guys, but with Evans/Gage a lock for 1/2 day one and then when Godwin comes back… i feel confident with our depth if they work professionally to be what theyre supposed to be. Grayson flashed. Perriman has been good multiple years. Scotty is a god damn mystery. Johnson is no better than me sitting on my couch, but his potential is a Sure handed third down machine.
Image
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8921
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 3102
Location: Virginia

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Buc2 »

mdb1958 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 9:23 am Hope the old guy can handle Florida heat.
I wouldn't worry too much about that. He will have professional trainers to help teach him how to acclimate.
Image
Don't tread on me
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

MJW wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 10:00 pm Hicks is a brick wall against the run. This is a signing that says, "We enjoy teams rushing for 70 YPG against us, and we think we'll keep that going."

Big issue is durability, like someone said. But I think we'll see him rotating with Hall situationally quite a bit, with Hall playing more passing downs and Hicks playing more running downs.
If we clamp down on the pass, any of that standard (of run defense) could be challenged.
Last edited by mdb1958 on Wed Jun 01, 2022 4:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8921
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 3102
Location: Virginia

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Buc2 »

Image
Image
Don't tread on me
Four Verticals
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:37 am
Reputation: 130

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Four Verticals »

Buc2 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:18 pm Image
Yeah. That one was somewhat similar to English.
mdb1958
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 92

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by mdb1958 »

Buc2 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:18 pm Image


One for Buc2.
User avatar
Dread
Posts: 2546
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:56 am
Reputation: 1152
Location: On the golf course

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Dread »

Image
The Outsider
Posts: 2538
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:33 pm
Reputation: 2

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by The Outsider »

Yeah, as others have said I see Hicks/Hall being a two-man rotation to replace Suh's snaps. Hopefully not being a 3 down player will keep Hicks healthy, because when he is healthy he's really fucking good.
User avatar
kaimaru
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:54 pm
Reputation: 530

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by kaimaru »

Bucs G.M. Jason Licht and vice president of football administration Mike Greenberg were able to lower Hicks’ 2022 cap charge to just $2.39 million. The team was able to have such a reduced cap charge due to voidable years that pushes $4.9 million worth of dead money into the 2023 season.
https://www.pewterreport.com/inside-buc ... -contract/
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by MJW »

The Outsider wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 6:14 pm Yeah, as others have said I see Hicks/Hall being a two-man rotation to replace Suh's snaps. Hopefully not being a 3 down player will keep Hicks healthy, because when he is healthy he's really fucking good.
Exactly.

Hicks on Running Downs
Hall on Passing Downs
Nacho and perhaps Deadrin Senat providing depth

I'd feel better if we had one more solid depth piece in the mix there, but Bowles can cook up enough diverse looks to cover.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Caradoc
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:34 pm
Reputation: 67

Re: Akiem Hicks: Signed.

Post by Caradoc »

BJJ34 wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 11:42 am
MJW wrote: Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:38 am

Yeah, I could see one more stealth good signing thanks to CAP MAGIC! But once Gronk is back, I don't know that we need one. With Tyler Johnson, Scott Miller, and Jaelen Darden all disappointing last year, and no certainties with Perriman or Grayson, I'd still be talking to veteran receivers. How low would someone like Julio go to chase a ring? How about a flier on...flyer Will Fuller? ETC.
I would not take a flier on any FA receiver given the rookie classes keep outperforming. Maybe not for our guys, but with Evans/Gage a lock for 1/2 day one and then when Godwin comes back… i feel confident with our depth if they work professionally to be what theyre supposed to be. Grayson flashed. Perriman has been good multiple years. Scotty is a god damn mystery. Johnson is no better than me sitting on my couch, but his potential is a Sure handed third down machine.
QFT
Post Reply