AVOID this QB

This section is for discussing possible future Buccaneers, as well as college football.
Post Reply
User avatar
kaimaru
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:54 pm
Reputation: 513

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by kaimaru »

I will dismiss this article simply because they couldn't even proofread this once. Jesus, anyone is allowed to post on FanNation I guess. Yes, I am sarcastic but my brain hurt reading this
The buzz will not stop surrounding around Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy will not stop, but are we sure he us is better than South Carolina's Spencer Rattler, a player set to who will fall a round or two further down the board in the 2024 NFL Draft?

As quarterbacks are expected to fly off the board next week, there is expected to be interest from teams like the New York Giants and the Minnesota Vikings to potentially trade up for the Wolverine Wolverines' quarterback. After leading Michigan to a national championship and losing just one game a 28-1 record as the starting quarterback a starter, the intangibles of McCarthy's intangibles have been touted as the primary reason for his rise up draft boards.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1009

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Grahamburn »

kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:03 pm
I will dismiss this article simply because they couldn't even proofread this once. Jesus, anyone is allowed to post on FanNation I guess. Yes, I am sarcastic but my brain hurt reading this
The buzz will not stop surrounding around Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy will not stop, but are we sure he us is better than South Carolina's Spencer Rattler, a player set to who will fall a round or two further down the board in the 2024 NFL Draft?

As quarterbacks are expected to fly off the board next week, there is expected to be interest from teams like the New York Giants and the Minnesota Vikings to potentially trade up for the Wolverine Wolverines' quarterback. After leading Michigan to a national championship and losing just one game a 28-1 record as the starting quarterback a starter, the intangibles of McCarthy's intangibles have been touted as the primary reason for his rise up draft boards.
What is it you did here?
User avatar
kaimaru
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:54 pm
Reputation: 513

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by kaimaru »

Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:07 pm
kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:03 pm

I will dismiss this article simply because they couldn't even proofread this once. Jesus, anyone is allowed to post on FanNation I guess. Yes, I am sarcastic but my brain hurt reading this

What is it you did here?
A rough draft of their rough draft. It was like a five year old wrote that so I entertained myself by correcting the grammar. Like BiBL, I was simply indulging an impulse
Grahamburn
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1009

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Grahamburn »

kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:12 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:07 pm

What is it you did here?
A rough draft of their rough draft. It was like a five year old wrote that so I entertained myself by correcting the grammar. Like BiBL, I was simply indulging an impulse
I'm like the chief of the grammar police. It seemed fine to me, but too each their own.
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 606

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Selmon Rules »

Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:38 pm
kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:12 pm

A rough draft of their rough draft. It was like a five year old wrote that so I entertained myself by correcting the grammar. Like BiBL, I was simply indulging an impulse
I'm like the chief of the grammar police. It seemed fine to me, but too each their own.
I see what you did there
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1009

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Grahamburn »

Selmon Rules wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 6:43 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:38 pm

I'm like the chief of the grammar police. It seemed fine to me, but too each their own.
I see what you did there
I like a to. I could break a too.
User avatar
kaimaru
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:54 pm
Reputation: 513

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by kaimaru »

kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:12 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:07 pm

What is it you did here?
A rough draft of their rough draft. It was like a five year old wrote that so I entertained myself by correcting the grammar. Like BiBL, I was simply indulging an impulse
That
User avatar
kaimaru
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:54 pm
Reputation: 513

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by kaimaru »

Grahamburn wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:38 pm
kaimaru wrote: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:12 pm

A rough draft of their rough draft. It was like a five year old wrote that so I entertained myself by correcting the grammar. Like BiBL, I was simply indulging an impulse
I'm like the chief of the grammar police. It seemed fine to me, but too each their own.
He said the buzz that won't stop did not stop in the first sentence. That is good grammar? I mean, I am not trying to fight, but that is horrible grammar
Grahamburn
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1009

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Grahamburn »

Snake
Posts: 11721
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3133

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Snake »

Yeah it’s a problem.
Image
mdb1958
Posts: 7627
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 59

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by mdb1958 »

Looks more like how much pressure you get in 2.5 seconds to me.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3522
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1009

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Grahamburn »

mdb1958
Posts: 7627
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 59

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by mdb1958 »

I spent a little time picturing Daniels with us and what it might be like.
User avatar
Noles1724
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:56 pm
Reputation: 540

Re: AVOID this QB

Post by Noles1724 »

mdb1958 wrote: Wed May 08, 2024 10:55 pm I spent a little time picturing Daniels with us and what it might be like.
Riveting
Image
Post Reply