Tampa Bay Buccaneers @ Indianapolis Colts Official Game Day Thread: Thanksgiving Weekend Edition

[Doctor]

Yet another GW drive set up for Baker. How many is that this year?

Atlanta and Houston I think? He scored on both. Bowles defense promptly gave the gam away.

Had a chance vs Bills too but couldn't close.

[acmillis]

Baker has no pocket awareness

[Cheb]

I like how Todd Bowles is just like us; spectating the offense with no input whatsoever.

God this guy just can't win.
Yeah, he should totally be micromanaging us to a win that bum.

Todd Bowles is the head coach. A head coach needs to look past his own side of the ball and, ya know, coach the whole team.

Wirfs got beat for that sack/fumble. This may be his worst game as a Buc. Two sacks allowed, a couple TFLs.

[Heisenberg]

Yall still want Trask?

Still want baker?

[Obsolete]

Yall still want Trask?

Yes

[Navybuc]

I can't believe Bowles called a Baker fumble on that play. FIRE HIM!

We’re 4-7 and just lost to a bad team. That’s why he should be fired. Our team is a joke.

[Grahamburn]

I can't believe Bowles called a Baker fumble on that play. FIRE HIM!

Gardner Minshew 27 points, bro.

[Snake]

Bowles is a loser. Glad he’s in charge of the TANK BABAY!

[13F11B]

Welcome to another loss Buccaneers faithful. Hope Bowles excites you. This will not get better until he is fired.

[Cheb]

Smart running by Taylor, sliding to the ground there.

[Phantom]

Haha!

[Onthebrink]

There is a force field at 20 points. 8th game this season that the offense has not scored more than 20 points.

[Jonny]

Can we please fire Bowles before he even steps into Tampa? In no other profession is this type of ineptitude considered acceptable.

[Heisenberg]

I can't believe Bowles called a Baker fumble on that play. FIRE HIM!

Sucked with jets, sucks here. You gargling his dick is really laughable

[13F11B]

Yall still want Trask?

Still want baker?

I would like to see WHAT he can do with starting players and against starting players. Pre-season has never allowed him to do that.

[Phantom]

I am so ready for the new quarterback next year!

[Dcbucsfan]

We are officially a bad team. We are the Jets under Bowles. As fans, we deserve better and deserve for Glazers to step in and make a statement firing.

[Miller4Prez64]

1-6 since the 3-1 start, pretty rough stuff.

[Backside]

Unsure why we’ve stopped dumping it off to White. That’s been our most consistent offense when we actually do it.

[Grahamburn]

Bowles is a loser. Glad he’s in charge of the TANK BABAY!

Nothing to debate any longer. They are losers. Bowles is a loser. Losers lose.

[Grahamburn]

Josh Allen with another sack.

[Onthebrink]

I was wrong this is the 9th game this season that the offense has scored 20 or less points. Bears game had a pick six.

[Heisenberg]

Bowles is a loser. Glad he’s in charge of the TANK BABAY!

Nothing to debate any longer. They are losers. Bowles is a loser. Losers lose.

Was never debatable. He shoulda been canned after the baffling rams call to lose the game, instead he gets promoted.

[acmillis]

This wasn’t a bad day, this is a bad team.
Put Trask in now.

[Bootz]

This wasn’t a bad day, this is a bad team.
Put Trask in now.

If this is a bad team and we put Trask in and he performs....badly.....you'll simply chalk it up to it being a bad team.

[acmillis]

This wasn’t a bad day, this is a bad team.
Put Trask in now.

If this is a bad team and we put Trask in and he performs....badly.....you'll simply chalk it up to it being a bad team.

At this point, I’ve accepted that we will (should) be drafting a qb high next season, I’m just sick of watching mediocre mayfield continue to be the same player he’s been for six seasons.

Give me the devil I don’t know, no matter the results.

[acmillis]

This wasn’t a bad day, this is a bad team.
Put Trask in now.

If this is a bad team and we put Trask in and he performs....badly.....you'll simply chalk it up to it being a bad team.

Oh…. And what if Trask is not bad/decent/good/geeat?

[Doctor]

Losing it on a play where our best player gets owned is pretty fitting.

[Bootz]

If this is a bad team and we put Trask in and he performs....badly.....you'll simply chalk it up to it being a bad team.

Oh…. And what if Trask is not bad/decent/good/geeat?

If. If. If.

All of your betting has turned you into the ultimate skeptic. Everything with you now is "well how do we know" "It could be different". You no longer operate in a realm of reality but rather a realm of hypotheticals.

[Doctor]

1-6 since the 3-1 start, pretty rough stuff.

Indeed. We had the ball with a chance for a walk off win in 4 of those 6 too. I'd imagine the results would be different if we were in year 2 or 3 of the offense but that's just crazy talk.

[acmillis]

Oh…. And what if Trask is not bad/decent/good/geeat?

If. If. If.

All of your betting has turned you into the ultimate skeptic. Everything with you now is "well how do we know" "It could be different". You no longer operate in a realm of reality but rather a realm of hypotheticals.

Again, that’s every draft pick ever. You seem satisfied with Baker… that’s cool, but I’d rather give the unknown a try.
If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool

[Jonny]

Oh…. And what if Trask is not bad/decent/good/geeat?

If. If. If.

All of your betting has turned you into the ultimate skeptic. Everything with you now is "well how do we know" "It could be different". You no longer operate in a realm of reality but rather a realm of hypotheticals.

You continue to have meaningless posts on this topic.

We both know you don't think Baker is a good enough QB. But you think he is better than Trask, I get it. But if we aren't playing for the Superbowl this year, what is the harm in checking if we at least have a decent backup QBOTF in Trask? Do you want Baker to get the snaps to see if he's going to blossom into a starting caliber QB? If not, then why do you bother commenting on this topic?

[Bootz]

If. If. If.

All of your betting has turned you into the ultimate skeptic. Everything with you now is "well how do we know" "It could be different". You no longer operate in a realm of reality but rather a realm of hypotheticals.

Again, that’s every draft pick ever. You seem satisfied with Baker… that’s cool, but I’d rather give the unknown a try.
If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool

You're ignoring and discounting the hundreds, if not thousands of hours of scouting, studying, analyzing these players. Teams don't simply walk into the door and say "hey let's do this and see what happens here" without 1st going over data and information to come to a decision. You act like this is blindly placing a bet.

Organizations place every player on the field because they feel there's a greater chance than not that said player will be successful. It's not 50/50 like you seem to believe it is. In a multi billion dollar industry they damn sure don't say "If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool". This ain't fantasy football.

[acmillis]

Again, that’s every draft pick ever. You seem satisfied with Baker… that’s cool, but I’d rather give the unknown a try.
If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool

You're ignoring and discounting the hundreds, if not thousands of hours of scouting, studying, analyzing these players. Teams don't simply walk into the door and say "hey let's do this and see what happens here" without 1st going over data and information to come to a decision. You act like this is blindly placing a bet.

Organizations place every player on the field because they feel there's a greater chance than not that said player will be successful. It's not 50/50 like you seem to believe it is. In a multi billion dollar industry they damn sure don't say "If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool". This ain't fantasy football.

So you’re saying a qb prospect drafted in the second round was drafted for a reason, not just because, “well, he might not suck”
Classic Shooz, counter arguing against yourself

[Bootz]

You're ignoring and discounting the hundreds, if not thousands of hours of scouting, studying, analyzing these players. Teams don't simply walk into the door and say "hey let's do this and see what happens here" without 1st going over data and information to come to a decision. You act like this is blindly placing a bet.

Organizations place every player on the field because they feel there's a greater chance than not that said player will be successful. It's not 50/50 like you seem to believe it is. In a multi billion dollar industry they damn sure don't say "If he sucks…cool
If he doesn’t…cool". This ain't fantasy football.

So you’re saying a qb prospect drafted in the second round was drafted for a reason, not just because, “well, he might not suck”
Classic Shooz, counter arguing against yourself

Absolutely. You speak as if scouting is some trivial hobby.