Week 11 Discussion

[Bootz]

QB A: 9 TDs 6 INTs 89.3 QB rating
QB B: 3 TDs 6 INTs 71.4 QB rating
QB C: 11 TDs 6 INTs 91.6 QB rating

Who are three bad quarterbacks?

A: Trevor Lawrence
B: Tyler Bagent
C: Justin Fields


Bonus QB: 14 TDs 6 INTs 90.5 QB Rating

[Primeminister]

Who are three bad quarterbacks?

A: Trevor Lawrence
B: Tyler Bagent
C: Justin Fields


Bonus QB: 14 TDs 6 INTs 90.5 QB Rating

Lawrence is doing far worse than I expected after last season.

[Primeminister]

Is the Bonus QB Baker? The QBR makes me say no, but the TD:INT ratio looks right.

[Bootz]

Is the Bonus QB Baker? The QBR makes me say no, but the TD:INT ratio looks right.

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

[Primeminister]

Is the Bonus QB Baker? The QBR makes me say no, but the TD:INT ratio looks right.

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

Wow. Didn’t expect Baker’s QBR to be above 96. Not sure where I would have guessed, but 96 felt a little high.

[Bootz]

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

Wow. Didn’t expect Baker’s QBR to be above 96. Not sure where I would have guessed, but 96 felt a little high.

93.7. Not 96. Burrow is at 90.5.

[Digital_Damage]

things can always be worse...

Could have paid 90 million for 12 games and a 42.5 QBR

[acmillis]

Is the Bonus QB Baker? The QBR makes me say no, but the TD:INT ratio looks right.

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

So you're saying Justin Fields is better than Joe Burrow?

I'm just not sure why you continue to defend/love Fields and hate on guys like Herbert.

Justin Fields is HORRENDOUS. He's worse than Kyle Trask (hell, he might be, IDK, you don't know, nobody does).

[Grahamburn]

Baker has only had one bad game. Outside of the loss against Detroit he has been very good.

[Snake]

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

So you're saying Justin Fields is better than Joe Burrow?

I'm just not sure why you continue to defend/love Fields and hate on guys like Herbert.

Justin Fields is HORRENDOUS. He's worse than Kyle Trask (hell, he might be, IDK, you don't know, nobody does).

We all know why

[MRM]

Herbert is on a team with a coach that does some goofy stuff that will probably get fired.

[Bootz]

Bakers QB rating is actually a little higher. But it's Joe Burrow.

So you're saying Justin Fields is better than Joe Burrow?

I'm just not sure why you continue to defend/love Fields and hate on guys like Herbert.

Justin Fields is HORRENDOUS. He's worse than Kyle Trask (hell, he might be, IDK, you don't know, nobody does).

Nope. But according to you Burrow is a bad QB along with the other 3, since his numbers fall in line with theirs. I don't even defend Fields. You won't find 1 post of me defending him. I just think the personal vendetta you have against him is hilarious.

[Bootz]

Herbert is on a team with a coach that does some goofy stuff that will probably get fired.

It'll be the 2nd time it's the coaches fault for him. I'm seeing a trend here.

[Grahamburn]

So you're saying Justin Fields is better than Joe Burrow?

I'm just not sure why you continue to defend/love Fields and hate on guys like Herbert.

Justin Fields is HORRENDOUS. He's worse than Kyle Trask (hell, he might be, IDK, you don't know, nobody does).

Nope. But according to you Burrow is a bad QB along with the other 3, since his numbers fall in line with theirs. I don't even defend Fields. You won't find 1 post of me defending him. I just think the personal vendetta you have against him is hilarious.

Personal vendetta? Fields has been objectively bad so far in his career and anyone who is honest about his play would admit that.

[Phantom]

Which QB you rather to play for the Bucs?

Herbert or Mayfield? It’s not that difficult

[Doctor]

Compared to how many bathrooms?

[Bootz]

Nope. But according to you Burrow is a bad QB along with the other 3, since his numbers fall in line with theirs. I don't even defend Fields. You won't find 1 post of me defending him. I just think the personal vendetta you have against him is hilarious.

Personal vendetta? Fields has been objectively bad so far in his careet and anyone who is honest about his play would admit that.

Yes, he has a personal vendetta. He doesn't call out any other QB except Fields. Not Mac Jones. Not even Daniel Jones. Anyone who says Kyle Trask is better than any QB is trying to push a narrative. He even said Tyler Bagent was playing better than Fields despite having significantly more turnovers than TDs.

He hasn't hidden his feelings about Fields, who the Bears obviously love.

[acmillis]

Personal vendetta? Fields has been objectively bad so far in his careet and anyone who is honest about his play would admit that.

Yes, he has a personal vendetta. He doesn't call out any other QB except Fields. Not Mac Jones. Not even Daniel Jones. Anyone who says Kyle Trask is better than any QB is trying to push a narrative. He even said Tyler Bagent was playing better than Fields despite having significantly more turnovers than TDs.

He hasn't hidden his feelings about Fields, who the Bears obviously love.

Because both of those dudes are ASS, and everybody knows it. Just like Fields is ASS and everybody (other than you) is willing to admit that.

[Doctor]

I see we're entering the "who is the bigger disappointment" part of the savior menstrual cycle.

[Bootz]

Yes, he has a personal vendetta. He doesn't call out any other QB except Fields. Not Mac Jones. Not even Daniel Jones. Anyone who says Kyle Trask is better than any QB is trying to push a narrative. He even said Tyler Bagent was playing better than Fields despite having significantly more turnovers than TDs.

He hasn't hidden his feelings about Fields, who the Bears obviously love.

Because both of those dudes are ASS, and everybody knows it. Just like Fields is ASS and everybody (other than you) is willing to admit that.

So all 3 are ass....yet you only call out 1.

Like @Snake stated, we all know why.

[Doctor]

Because no one is actually trying to defend the other two?

[acmillis]

Because both of those dudes are ASS, and everybody knows it. Just like Fields is ASS and everybody (other than you) is willing to admit that.

So all 3 are ass....yet you only call out 1.

Like @Snake stated, we all know why.

Because you're racist, is that why?

I only call out one because the consensus on all is that they suck, yet you post that Fields does not suck, which is why I only speak to his suckage.

If you were to say that Jones has no weapons or that Mack just needs MOAR THYME, I'd bash you!

[Bootz]

So all 3 are ass....yet you only call out 1.

Like @Snake stated, we all know why.

Because you're racist, is that why?

I only call out one because the consensus on all is that they suck, yet you post that Fields does not suck, which is why I only speak to his suckage.

If you were to say that Jones has no weapons or that Mack just needs MOAR THYME, I'd bash you!

I suppose you are racist. Your choice.

Again you'll not find 1 post of me praising Justin Fields. I have however defended Mac Jones because New England is doing him dirty. I've even said we should trade for him if they dont want him. But you don't choose to see that and "we all know why".

[acmillis]

Jesus titty fucking Christ, you’re unbearable.

[Bootz]

Jesus titty fucking Christ, you’re unbearable.

Now you know how I feel.

[Bootz]

[Phantom]

What a CLUSTERFUCK organization

Panthers’ HC Frank Reich said he is resuming the team’s play-calling duties, starting Sunday against Dallas. Reich doesn't believe the change is a big deal, the play calling still will be collaborative, and he estimated the offense will be only about 10 percent different[

[Doctor]

Clusterfuck is a bit much. Kinda agree it's not that big of a deal. Also agree with his assessment that it won't help much either.

[Bootz]

Hate to say we need a win....But we need this win.

[GreatTimes]

A loss to the 49's this Sunday is bad. What would be even worse is if the Bucs lose to both the 49's this week and at the Colts the following weekend.

[Grahamburn]

A loss to the 49's this Sunday is bad. What would be even worse is if the Bucs lose to both the 49's this week and at the Colts the following weekend.

I’m chalking this one up as an L. I’d say Jacksonville is an L. Then I think they could afford to lose one more and still win the South at 9-8 as long as that loss isn’t to the Saints.

[Bootz]

A loss to the 49's this Sunday is bad. What would be even worse is if the Bucs lose to both the 49's this week and at the Colts the following weekend.

I’m chalking this one up as an L. I’d say Jacksonville is an L. Then I think they could afford to lose one more and still win the South at 9-8 as long as that loss isn’t to the Saints.

Jacksonville isn't a guaranteed loss in my mind. I get that "you are what your record says you are" but their losses stand out way more than their wins. When they lose, man they make sure they don't make it a game. Didn't score a TD against the Chiefs. Gave up 37 to the Texans and lost by 20. And of course the ass kicking the Niners put on them last week, 34-3. Not saying we're all world or anything. But to our credit our games don't generally get out of hand. The Jags don't scare me 1 bit.

[mdb1958]

ESPN will not respond to you would be my guess.

C'mon man. He ain't 6'4 or 210.

Could he be under valued to the point of getting him in the 2nd round?

[Grahamburn]

I’m chalking this one up as an L. I’d say Jacksonville is an L. Then I think they could afford to lose one more and still win the South at 9-8 as long as that loss isn’t to the Saints.

Jacksonville isn't a guaranteed loss in my mind. I get that "you are what your record says you are" but their losses stand out way more than their wins. When they lose, man they make sure they don't make it a game. Didn't score a TD against the Chiefs. Gave up 37 to the Texans and lost by 20. And of course the ass kicking the Niners put on them last week, 34-3. Not saying we're all world or anything. But to our credit our games don't generally get out of hand. The Jags don't scare me 1 bit.

I agree. Just kind of figuring out what it looks like as far as expected record. Green Bay in Lambeau will be tough regardless of their record. I think they need a blanket 5-3 finish to the season to have a chance at winning the NFC South. They could potentially do better or much worse. Who knows.

[Grahamburn]

I'd say Daniels ends up being a top 10 pick at this point. Statistically he's the best QB going right now.