Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Snake
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3111

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Snake »

Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:19 pm You know for a guy that repeatedly attacks others for gurgling cock you sure seem to love taking all TB12 inches.
Something like 30,000 men have suited up for NFL games.

I think being the all-time greatest in a sport that is already composed of the 0.000001 in what they do…probably merits a disproportionate amount of praise.

:lol:
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

At least you're aware it's disproportionate.

I just love how for two decades and six rings Brady is a "system QB" in NE, but as soon as he's in Tampa he's the end all be all.
Image
Snake
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3111

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Snake »

Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:29 pm At least you're aware it's disproportionate.

I just love how for two decades and six rings Brady is a "system QB" in NE, but as soon as he's in Tampa he's the end all be all.
Now that we have hindsight and the story has been told, I think we have more clarity about the Tom Brady system quarterback thing.

It is impossible to know if Tom Brady becomes TB12 if any other team drafts him. We know he was infinitely coachable and had innate drive. He bought into the Belichick approach. The obsessive attention to detail, the constant refinement, the method of study, dedication to practicing perfectly. Clearly, there was a symbiotic relationship between his disposition and the program.

He tapped into his potential. He became a freakishly good thrower of the football. I don’t like when people say, “Tom Brady lacked talent.” The mental talent is clear. the dude can throw a fucking football really fast and with surgical precision and with extreme repeatability. I can’t take somebody “without” talent and make them that talented at throwing the football.

At some point during his patriots tenure, he put it all together. The studiousness, the refined throwing ability, the crafted leadership approach. To the point where it was potable. The structure of the program that played into his development, “the system,” he took it with him.

I don’t know when that was. Maybe it was in 2007. Maybe it is when he was carrying those not so great Patriots teams post-Rams Super Bowl.

All that to say, I don’t think it’s fair to call him a system quarterback. I think the system helped him develop into who he became. But it takes two to tango. Leaving the system, going and winning a Super Bowl the next season and elevating a team, suggest that he no longer needed a “system” anymore. He was the system.

And that’s to say very little of the fact that the program became amplified and probably actually worked in large part because Tom himself. Symbiotic relationships work both ways.
Image
User avatar
Babeinbucland
Posts: 3947
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:33 pm
Reputation: 804

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Babeinbucland »

Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:11 pm
Snake wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:31 am

Just hope for football Jesus to get resurrected again and choose Tampa, again.
You know we had a whole ass team outside of Tom, right?
Ya know, this comment made me think about how we expected so much out of Brady last year and we sucked. I think we had the exact same issues last year as this year, they are just more glaring now because we don’t have Brady.
I said what I said

Image
Terry Tate
Posts: 673
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:52 pm
Reputation: 327

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Terry Tate »

Babeinbucland wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:57 pm
Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:11 pm

You know we had a whole ass team outside of Tom, right?
Ya know, this comment made me think about how we expected so much out of Brady last year and we sucked. I think we had the exact same issues last year as this year, they are just more glaring now because we don’t have Brady.
That and we also had Leftwich as OC. Say what you want about Canales but he is still an upgrade over Lefty. It was that low of a bar
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

Snake wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:52 pm
Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:29 pm At least you're aware it's disproportionate.

I just love how for two decades and six rings Brady is a "system QB" in NE, but as soon as he's in Tampa he's the end all be all.
Now that we have hindsight and the story has been told, I think we have more clarity about the Tom Brady system quarterback thing.

It is impossible to know if Tom Brady becomes TB12 if any other team drafts him. We know he was infinitely coachable and had innate drive. He bought into the Belichick approach. The obsessive attention to detail, the constant refinement, the method of study, dedication to practicing perfectly. Clearly, there was a symbiotic relationship between his disposition and the program.

He tapped into his potential. He became a freakishly good thrower of the football. I don’t like when people say, “Tom Brady lacked talent.” The mental talent is clear. the dude can throw a fucking football really fast and with surgical precision and with extreme repeatability. I can’t take somebody “without” talent and make them that talented at throwing the football.

At some point during his patriots tenure, he put it all together. The studiousness, the refined throwing ability, the crafted leadership approach. To the point where it was potable. The structure of the program that played into his development, “the system,” he took it with him.

I don’t know when that was. Maybe it was in 2007. Maybe it is when he was carrying those not so great Patriots teams post-Rams Super Bowl.

All that to say, I don’t think it’s fair to call him a system quarterback. I think the system helped him develop into who he became. But it takes two to tango. Leaving the system, going and winning a Super Bowl the next season and elevating a team, suggest that he no longer needed a “system” anymore. He was the system.

And that’s to say very little of the fact that the program became amplified and probably actually worked in large part because Tom himself. Symbiotic relationships work both ways.
Nicely put.
Image
Deja Entendu
Posts: 897
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:17 pm
Reputation: 350
Location: Philly

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Deja Entendu »

Doctor wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:29 pm At least you're aware it's disproportionate.

I just love how for two decades and six rings Brady is a "system QB" in NE, but as soon as he's in Tampa he's the end all be all.
Two facts about anyone who said that:

1. They didn’t actually watch or know what they were talking about.
2. They were a hatin’ ass hater.
Jonny
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:34 pm
Reputation: 285

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Jonny »

Terry Tate wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 7:05 pm
Babeinbucland wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:57 pm

Ya know, this comment made me think about how we expected so much out of Brady last year and we sucked. I think we had the exact same issues last year as this year, they are just more glaring now because we don’t have Brady.
That and we also had Leftwich as OC. Say what you want about Canales but he is still an upgrade over Lefty. It was that low of a bar
Canales is an improvement, but not good enough. Too often the receivers are blanketed in red zone and when our offense is pinned back near our goal line.

Canales needs attend a course in Todd Bowles coaching academy. Bowles' defense is all about creating space to the receivers.
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1163

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by 13F11B »

Jonny wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:10 pm

Canales needs attend a course in Todd Bowles coaching academy. Bowles' defense is all about creating space to the receivers.
You forgot that Bowles defense scheme is also about holes for the runners and big 3rd down plays to sustain drives. Bowles aims to keep his offense off the field.
mdb1958
Posts: 7572
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 44

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by mdb1958 »

13F11B wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:26 pm
Jonny wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:10 pm

Canales needs attend a course in Todd Bowles coaching academy. Bowles' defense is all about creating space to the receivers.
You forgot that Bowles defense scheme is also about holes for the runners and big 3rd down plays to sustain drives. Bowles aims to keep his offense off the field.


Or he had to take a file to the defensive puzzle board to make it close to a fit. No win or loss this year looked like we were in unison.
The same goes for the offense.

Our talk went from three plays deciding a game to unable to play good.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

Play well.
Image
User avatar
Babeinbucland
Posts: 3947
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:33 pm
Reputation: 804

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Babeinbucland »

Lol
I said what I said

Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

I think Trask still has time.

Here's the thing, everyone looks at QB like it's just any other position and you just need to identify the good ones and get one. But it doesn't really work like that.

Okay sure, sometimes it does. We have seen in recent years if you have the rest of your team built out and the prize QB likes you it can happen. But normally it's more like setting up as many good bets as you can.

Idealist will hate it. They want you to just pluck your answer at QB out of the draft and be done. Situations like RG3 and Cousins taken by Washington in the same draft or the Brees Rivers crossover seasons or having $100M Bledsoe and Brady boils their blood. It's inefficient. It's imperfect. But finding the answer at QB often is.

If Baker doesn't flat out show out the remainder of the season enough to make the staff want to hitch their careers to him instead of a rookie from this class, he likely walks. Which is fine. It was always low risk high reward long shot.

The rookie will likely compete with Trask. With a year in the system not uncommon to give the vet the nod. Maybe he does well enough to Rivers our rookie for awhile. Wouldn't that be something?
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 994

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Grahamburn »

If Baker/Trask and "the staff" are an option next year they had better catch fire real fast.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

Pretty sure everyone at OBP knew what the situation was going into the season. While winning the division is the goal and would be great, I doubt there's some ultimatum.
Image
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1163

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by 13F11B »

Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 1:00 pm I think Trask still has time.

Here's the thing, everyone looks at QB like it's just any other position and you just need to identify the good ones and get one. But it doesn't really work like that.

Okay sure, sometimes it does. We have seen in recent years if you have the rest of your team built out and the prize QB likes you it can happen. But normally it's more like setting up as many good bets as you can.

Idealist will hate it. They want you to just pluck your answer at QB out of the draft and be done. Situations like RG3 and Cousins taken by Washington in the same draft or the Brees Rivers crossover seasons or having $100M Bledsoe and Brady boils their blood. It's inefficient. It's imperfect. But finding the answer at QB often is.

If Baker doesn't flat out show out the remainder of the season enough to make the staff want to hitch their careers to him instead of a rookie from this class, he likely walks. Which is fine. It was always low risk high reward long shot.

The rookie will likely compete with Trask. With a year in the system not uncommon to give the vet the nod. Maybe he does well enough to Rivers our rookie for awhile. Wouldn't that be something?
Exactly. The other hard thing about QB is that unlike every other position they either get 100% of the playing time or 0% of the playing time. That is precious little to grow from. A developing linebacker can get a play here or there with the starters and against the starters. The QB has to wait for the other guy to get injured. If they get in when it is a blowout other starters are also not playing.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6298
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1618
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Bootz »

Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 2:09 pm Pretty sure everyone at OBP knew what the situation was going into the season. While winning the division is the goal and would be great, I doubt there's some ultimatum.
This is why I'm dubious about the Glazers moving on. $70mil in dead cap space is nothing to sneeze at. Those are real resources that are not available to utilize.
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 994

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Grahamburn »

Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 2:09 pm Pretty sure everyone at OBP knew what the situation was going into the season. While winning the division is the goal and would be great, I doubt there's some ultimatum.
Agree to disagree. We’ll know soon enough.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 994

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:07 pm
Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 2:09 pm Pretty sure everyone at OBP knew what the situation was going into the season. While winning the division is the goal and would be great, I doubt there's some ultimatum.
This is why I'm dubious about the Glazers moving on. $70mil in dead cap space is nothing to sneeze at. Those are real resources that are not available to utilize.
What’s last years excuse?
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

Find out next year.

You acting like 31 teams don't have excuses every year. If I have to hear about KCs tackles one more time...
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 994

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Grahamburn »

Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:33 pm Find out next year.
I think we can agree that it doesn't make much sense to approach this draft without adding a franchise QB as the ultimate goal.

If Jason Licht and Todd Bowles aren't on the hot seat after this season they certainly will be heading into next season. Are we letting this regime draft another Face of the Franchise quarterback? They've whiffed twice. Will they even be motivated to do so knowing that player may/may not be able to help the 2024 team win?

A Licht/Bowles/Canales combination heading into next year means we're probably going into the 2024 season with Baker Mayfield and Trask again. Not exactly ideal.

I didn't hate the idea after week 4, but god dammit if I don't hate it now.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6298
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1618
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:18 pm
Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:07 pm

This is why I'm dubious about the Glazers moving on. $70mil in dead cap space is nothing to sneeze at. Those are real resources that are not available to utilize.
What’s last years excuse?
Of winning the division? Didn't know you needed one.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4443
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1123

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Doctor »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:00 pm
Doctor wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:33 pm Find out next year.
I think we can agree that it doesn't make much sense to approach this draft without adding a franchise QB as the ultimate goal.

If Jason Licht and Todd Bowles aren't on the hot seat after this season they certainly will be heading into next season. Are we letting this regime draft another Face of the Franchise quarterback? They've whiffed twice. Will they even be motivated to do so knowing that player may/may not be able to help the 2024 team win?

A Licht/Bowles/Canales combination heading into next year means we're probably going into the 2024 season with Baker Mayfield and Trask again. Not exactly ideal.

I didn't hate the idea after week 4, but god dammit if I don't hate it now.
QB is the one exception a make to my BPA rule because they just don't play by the same rules as others.

With that said I'm pretty sure that's the 3 QB plan. Again, idealism aside, you are giving three guys a chance to prove their the guy. If Baker doesn't show out beyond a doubt, it's likely going to result in a rookie QB in this class.

Trask will likely start the season. If he shows out you tag him and see if he does it again. This will make rookie lovers very upset but it's how you find a QB.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6298
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1618
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:32 am
Bootz wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:29 am

Baker isn't sitting. He played the rest of the game on that same ankle. No way he sits with full weeks practice. He's too tough for that.
That sounds like *gasp* speculation...
More speculation

Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 7572
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 44

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by mdb1958 »

Me? I'd like to see the different passes Trask puts up. I like Mayfield alright but he doesnt seem to have the arm to open this offense up.
Jonny
Posts: 685
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:34 pm
Reputation: 285

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Jonny »

mdb1958 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 9:43 pm Me? I'd like to see the different passes Trask puts up. I like Mayfield alright but he doesnt seem to have the arm to open this offense up.
I don't think arm has ever been Baker's issue. As a matter of fact, the juice in his throws combined with his ability to throw off platform has been the the most impressive for a Bucs QB in my lifetime as a Bucs fan. Freeman and Winston had throw distance aspect covered, but due to poor/inconsistent mechanics or slow release their throws rarely looked pretty, adaptable and fluid the way Baker's do.

What I have liked from Trask especially after this preseason is his touch on the throws and ability to throw accurately with anticipation. There was a Glennon like slow footedness and slow release that seems to have been coached out of him. I have been among those that referred to him as Kyle Trash and now I feel like he may at least be a decent backup.
Snake
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3111

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Snake »

Mayfield and Allen were the only two quarterbacks to throw over 61 miles an hour at their combine, if I remember correctly.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6298
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1618
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Bootz »

Yea you're going nowhere trying to make a case that Baker doesn't have the arm. He has plenty despite his stature.
Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 7572
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 44

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by mdb1958 »

Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 10:53 pm Yea you're going nowhere trying to make a case that Baker doesn't have the arm. He has plenty despite his stature.
Like I said struggles to put up 300 yard games
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3827
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2425
Location: West Coast

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Cheb »

mdb1958 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:40 pm
Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 10:53 pm Yea you're going nowhere trying to make a case that Baker doesn't have the arm. He has plenty despite his stature.
Like I said struggles to put up 300 yard games
That's not because he lacks arm strength. It's because he can't consistently stack wins to stay on the field, particularly on third down (where we have struggled all year).
Image
mdb1958
Posts: 7572
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 44

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by mdb1958 »

What is it - lowest output since 2014 and Josh McCown
mdb1958
Posts: 7572
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 44

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by mdb1958 »

Cheb wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:51 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:40 pm

Like I said struggles to put up 300 yard games
That's not because he lacks arm strength. It's because he can't consistently stack wins to stay on the field, particularly on third down (where we have struggled all year).
Never said anything about strength.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 994

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:42 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:18 pm

What’s last years excuse?
Of winning the division? Didn't know you needed one.
Hang that banner from the rafters.
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1163

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by 13F11B »

Cheb wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:51 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 11:40 pm

Like I said struggles to put up 300 yard games
That's not because he lacks arm strength. It's because he can't consistently stack wins to stay on the field, particularly on third down (where we have struggled all year).
His deep ball is an issue... not because of lack of strength, but lack of accuracy.
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2081
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 593

Re: Is Baker truly a better option than Trask?

Post by Selmon Rules »

Bootz wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:42 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:18 pm

What’s last years excuse?
Of winning the division? Didn't know you needed one.
The division championship was simply the lipstick we put on the pig that was our season last year.

Yes, we were the best team in the division but we were still one of the ugliest girls at the party last year
Image
Post Reply