Will/should Bowles name a DC?

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by King Bootz »

The defense wasn't really a problem when healthy. But health was a concern all season. But anyway, Bowles was defacto DC last year with Rodgers & Foote splitting game planning responsibilities.

With all of the coaching staff changes, it stands to reason that Bowles might opt to have an official DC to handle defensive game planning and perhaps playcalling responsibilities.


What do yall think?
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

In his final PC he talked about having them try calling plays in the preseason so I don't think so. If it does happen I think it may be something that happens more gradually midseason if things are going well.
Image
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3795
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2391
Location: West Coast

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Cheb »

I think he should name a DC, who has more power than just the name.

Speaking from experience, it's difficult to give both sides of the ball their due diligence if you are still gameplanning and calling plays for one side of the ball.

I've seen great teams do it both ways. On the teams I was on that didn't suck out loud, one had a "CEO" type head coach and the other ran his side of the ball. Both were successful.

Reasonable people can disagree, but maybe having Bowles offer some offensive criticism instead of standing there like an Easter Island statue might be valuable.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

It only makes sense to do if we think there is actually someone that can actually do the job just as good if not better.

Would the team stand to benefit from Bowles paying more attention to the offense? Maybe. Maybe not. There are many ways to successfully HC in the NFL, some more delegatory some more involved. Sometimes having a HC know what he's good at and sticking to it is best- see BB. The Pats ran best when he stuck to defense and let the GOAT and OC take care of the other side. More often than not when BB got out of his lane and put his fingerprints on the offense it ended up being a bust.

You can win with a Harbaugh type, you can win with a Gurden type.

I think Bowles is more of a Reid or Arians type but on defense (Flores?). If they find someone who they feel can call plays as they call plays, they'll pass the stick. At the same time, they do need/prefer to have someone on their level managing the other side who they can trust to mostly leave to their own devices.
Image
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2073
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 592

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Selmon Rules »

Seems to me that any good DC knows how his defense can be attacked in every way possible so why wouldn't the defensive head coach's input be useful in offensive game planning and especially during the game when the offense is getting schooled???
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

..... because his offense isn't playing his own defense on gameday?
Image
User avatar
13F11B
Posts: 4675
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:41 pm
Reputation: 1153

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by 13F11B »

Selmon Rules wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 7:05 pm Seems to me that any good DC knows how his defense can be attacked in every way possible so why wouldn't the defensive head coach's input be useful in offensive game planning and especially during the game when the offense is getting schooled???
In the case of Bowles his defense was getting schooled far too often as well.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

The defense was built to be the Yang to Bruce Arians Ying. It was built for putting away teams when you get a lead (hence Grave Diggers). This is why the words "start fast" were said ad nauseam over the last 3 years. There was a ripple effect to doing so. Likewise, the opposite is true. To put it in oversimplistic terms, it's still really good at defending the run while playing the pass but not great at defending the pass when playing the run. So when teams get up on us and our offense isn't responding, it makes for a bad day.
Last edited by Doctor on Fri Jan 20, 2023 7:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2073
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 592

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Selmon Rules »

Doctor wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 7:10 pm ..... because his offense isn't playing his own defense on gameday?
Point being he can see what is happening and what the other defense is doing and can tell the OC how to counter what the defense is doing as it was apparent the OC wasn't doing it.

He is also the HC
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

The defenses we were playing weren't "doing" anything particularly novel. I would dare to guess that defenses perhaps did disguise and bait Brady a little bit better than usual (I don't know if the tape backs this up), but really defenses were just beating us at our own game and when they weren't we were beating ourselves.
Image
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by MJW »

Every head coach should have both an OC and a DC.

NEARLY every head coach should let their OC and DC call the plays. There are a few who can multitask at that level. But many more who simply think they can.

And no, Bowles will not do this, because according to Bowles, the only thing wrong with this team is that we weren't doing football good enough.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

I mean if someone wants to try make a case for someone else clearly being able to our DC Bowles, I'd love to hear it.
Image
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by MJW »

Doctor wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 3:34 am I mean if someone wants to try make a case for someone else clearly being able to our DC Bowles, I'd love to hear it.
You're missing the point.

The point is not whether or not Bowles is capable of being a good DC while he's doing head coach things.

The point is whether or not he can be a good head coach while he's doing DC things.

Do you feel like he was a good head coach this year?
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4409
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Doctor »

If we're crucifying Bowled for regression on the offense because "he's the top guy", I can't imagine what we'd do to him if the defense was worse next year.

Do you think the defense will be better or worse with someone else calling the plays?
Image
User avatar
Moozician
Posts: 890
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 10:41 pm
Reputation: 413

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Moozician »

He should name a DC. If only to get fresh ideas... Two head are better, and all that.

Also, I would think that he would perform better as a HC if he wasn't having to worry about defensive scheming all game.
Image
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by King Bootz »

Moozician wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 10:40 am He should name a DC. If only to get fresh ideas... Two head are better, and all that.

Also, I would think that he would perform better as a HC if he wasn't having to worry about defensive scheming all game.
Not sure you'd want many "fresh ideas" on defense. The best defenses in football are always the most simple. They just execute better than everyone else. Rush as few guys as you can to get to the QB, have defenders who can keep gap integrity and make tackles, have guys who can cover, throw in a wrinkle every once in a while. That should be the goal of every defense.
Big Irv
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:56 pm
Reputation: 60

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by Big Irv »

Ring back Raheem Morris! We will need to be YOUNGRY this year with Trask at the helm.
Image
mdb1958
Posts: 7533
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 39

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by mdb1958 »

Whatever DC that would be picked would also have position experience that is his bread and butter. Bowles has decided to still keep some position loyalties around him.
mdb1958
Posts: 7533
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 39

Re: Will/should Bowles name a DC?

Post by mdb1958 »

Note: We made teams punt more than anyone else.
Bad news: Those punters put us inside the 20 more than anyone else.

This tells me we had trouble with the quick three and out - instead we let them get up to mid field more than I'd like.
Post Reply