The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
BucsNBills
Posts: 2164
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 557

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

Snake wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 4:41 pm I wonder which quarterback Ryans has his eye on
I'd go CJ Stroud. After seeing Tua break apart like a piece of brittle China, taking Bryce Young who is even more frail than Tua seems like a recipe for disaster.
Phantom
Posts: 6975
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1184

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

BucsNBills wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 4:44 pm
Snake wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 4:41 pm I wonder which quarterback Ryans has his eye on
I'd go CJ Stroud. After seeing Tua break apart like a piece of brittle China, taking Bryce Young who is even more frail than Tua seems like a recipe for disaster.

Yup, this… Colts will most likely take Young
Snake
Posts: 11565
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3083

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

He is quite diminutive, but we don’t know if he’s frail yet. Tua had a lot more injuries coming out of college.
Image
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

So who's wrong here??



BucsNBills
Posts: 2164
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 557

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

King Bootz wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:03 pm So who's wrong here??



Thinking Rappaport got the real timing and Schefter got the PR damage control version of events.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

BucsNBills wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:06 pm
King Bootz wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 5:03 pm So who's wrong here??



Thinking Rappaport got the real timing and Schefter got the PR damage control version of events.
That's exactly how it seems now that you mention it. Schefter kinda gives it away with the "it's all coincidental".
Navybuc
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:35 am
Reputation: 365

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Navybuc »

Broncos didn’t want to give up the compensation. But when Ryans fell through, they felt like they had no choice. It’s a good hire…just a lot for a coach. But Payton is one of the few out there I would trust that can fix Russell Wilson.
GreatTimes
Posts: 915
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
Reputation: 215

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by GreatTimes »

The Bucs have had 4 head coaches of color. Has any other NFL had as many? How many NFL teams have never hired a HC of color?
The Outsider
Posts: 2538
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:33 pm
Reputation: 2

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by The Outsider »

Is that relevant right now?
Digital_Damage
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:33 pm
Reputation: 1005

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Digital_Damage »

The Outsider wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:12 pm Is that relevant right now?
It is actually kind of an interesting question; I would like to know what team(s) has not hired a HC of color.
Image
The Outsider
Posts: 2538
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:33 pm
Reputation: 2

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by The Outsider »

Digital_Damage wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:14 pm
The Outsider wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:12 pm Is that relevant right now?
It is actually kind of an interesting question; I would like to know what team(s) has not hired a HC of color.
I get that, it's just that unprompted discussions involving race taking place in general threads rarely goes well.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

Falcons
Ravens
Bills
Cowboys
Texans- (Until today)
Jaguars
Rams
Patriots
Saints
Giants
Titans
Navybuc
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2022 10:35 am
Reputation: 365

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Navybuc »

King Bootz wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:26 pm
Texans- (Until today)
Damn…didn’t know Lovie Smith was a white dude.
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 510

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

King Bootz wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:26 pm Falcons
Ravens
Bills
Cowboys
Texans- (Until today)
Jaguars
Rams
Patriots
Saints
Giants
Titans
The Texans’ last two coaches before Ryans were African American too. Unless we don’t want to count them since they were basically one and done pupppet coaches that got hired to take Ls in a rebuild.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

Whoops, the last 2 years happened so fast it bypassed me lol.

In all seriousness though, this kinda shows what @The Outsider said is right. People get very uncomfortable and defensive about these discussions and lash out. I name 12 teams, 11 of which have never had a minority coach and 2 consecutive posters only want to highlight the 1 mistake as a way to deflect from having that discussion. It's a tried and true defense mechanism people with inherent biases and prejudices resort to.
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 510

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

King Bootz wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:00 pm Whoops, the last 2 years happened so fast it bypassed me lol.

In all seriousness though, this kinda shows what @The Outsider said is right. People get very uncomfortable and defensive about these discussions and lash out. I name 12 teams, 11 of which have never had a minority coach and 2 consecutive posters only want to highlight the 1 mistake as a way to deflect from having that discussion. It's a tried and true defense mechanism people with inherent biases and prejudices resort to.
Lash out? I corrrected a minor mistake, it’s not that deep.
Snake
Posts: 11565
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3083

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

99.x% of people have implicit biases.
Image
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:11 pm 99.x% of people have implicit biases.
Same people try to pretend it doesn't exist.
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

When you truly have no direction and are still looking for one. 12 hour interviews? Really?


User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4408
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

I mean if you are talking about a grand plan for a team, sure, you could easily chat for 12 hours. We spent 12 hours on nine Kyle Trask plays.
Image
User avatar
MJW
Posts: 4488
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:21 pm
Reputation: 2039

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by MJW »

King Bootz wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:51 am When you truly have no direction and are still looking for one. 12 hour interviews? Really?


It reeks of, "You remember how I gave that one guy the job a few months ago with no due diligence? HOW DO YOU ASSHOLES LIKE THIS?!"

And when he ends up hiring Saturday anyway...

Image
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8424
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 2844
Location: Virginia

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Buc2 »

MJW wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:29 pm
King Bootz wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 11:51 am When you truly have no direction and are still looking for one. 12 hour interviews? Really?


It reeks of, "You remember how I gave that one guy the job a few months ago with no due diligence? HOW DO YOU ASSHOLES LIKE THIS?!"

And when he ends up hiring Saturday anyway...

Image
You may be one of the most cynical posters in the team discussion forum, MJW. Love reading your shit whether I agree with you or not. Please, never change. :D
Image
Don't tread on me
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4408
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1110

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Still hires Saturday 😆
Image
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1281
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 510

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

Am I an asshole for wanting the Colts to hire Saturday just for the chaos? The meltdown people had when he got the interim job was hilarious (justified, but still hilarious) and I can’t imagine what it would be like if they actually hired him full time even after all the backlash turned out to be justified.
Phantom
Posts: 6975
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1184

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Aaron Rodgers-Davante Adams ?

Stay tuned folks
Grahamburn
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 982

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Derek Carr has said he will not extend the Feb. 15 deadline for the $40.4 million injury guarantee clause in his contract.​

In other words, the Raiders have to trade Carr before Feb. 15. Carr has a no-trade clause, so in other other words, he will not be getting traded, instead forcing his release. “I don’t think that would be best for me,” Carr said matter-of-factly. He is correct. Carr has zero reason to play ball with the Raiders, and though the remaining money on his deal is lucrative, he will make even more as a free agent in this quarterback-starved league. The Raiders threw Carr under the bus on the way out the door. He is reclaiming some dignity now.
SOURCE: ESPN
Feb 2, 2023, 11:18 PM ET
mdb1958
Posts: 7532
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 39

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by mdb1958 »

Buc2 wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:27 pm
MJW wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 12:29 pm

It reeks of, "You remember how I gave that one guy the job a few months ago with no due diligence? HOW DO YOU ASSHOLES LIKE THIS?!"

And when he ends up hiring Saturday anyway...

Image
You may be one of the most cynical posters in the team discussion forum, MJW. Love reading your shit whether I agree with you or not. Please, never change. :D
No one says never change but Delt
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8424
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 2844
Location: Virginia

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Buc2 »

mdb1958 wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 8:48 am
Buc2 wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 1:27 pm

You may be one of the most cynical posters in the team discussion forum, MJW. Love reading your shit whether I agree with you or not. Please, never change. :D
No one says never change but Delt
And, obviously, Buc2.
Image
Don't tread on me
User avatar
Selmon Rules
Posts: 2073
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
Reputation: 592

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Selmon Rules »

Buc2 wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 9:25 am
mdb1958 wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 8:48 am

No one says never change but Delt
And, obviously, Buc2.
Power move, I like it














Never change :D
Image
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »



I've hated seeing this since defenders started doing this in recent years. This technique is not taught at any level of football. Rugby has seen these type of tackles rise recently and have had injuries from them rise as well. Get rid of it.
acmillis
Posts: 2781
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:47 pm
Reputation: 1004

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by acmillis »

Dear lord, the pussification of the game continues.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3795
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2391
Location: West Coast

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Cheb »

King Bootz wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:25 pm

I've hated seeing this since defenders started doing this in recent years. This technique is not taught at any level of football. Rugby has seen these type of tackles rise recently and have had injuries from them rise as well. Get rid of it.
This isn't exactly a new technique. It's one of the better ways to tackle a ballcarrier when you are behind him; wrap him up and drop your body to drag him to the ground. It arrest his forward momentum far more than just swiping a leg or any other posterior techniques.

If it leads to injury then I understand trying to avoid it. But at the same time, this isn't like those horse collar tackles than ruined Bo Jackson's and Cadillac Williams' careers. As far as I know, these hip-drop types of tackles cause ankle sprains, hardly debilitating injuries. And they happen all the time.

Let's say I'm chasing down a ballcarrier from behind and wrap him up around the waist. I strain to pull him backwards but slip, which causes my body to fall. Do I now get penalized for a hip-drop tackle?

This is going to make tackling definitely harder, and just takes another tool out of defender's toolboxes to get ballcarriers to the ground. I'm all about player safety, but this feels like it's a bit much.
Last edited by Cheb on Fri Feb 03, 2023 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Snake
Posts: 11565
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3083

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

They’ve already made tackling really difficult.

They should get rid of turf if they care about injuries.
Image
BucsNBills
Posts: 2164
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 557

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

Cheb wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 6:28 pm
King Bootz wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:25 pm

I've hated seeing this since defenders started doing this in recent years. This technique is not taught at any level of football. Rugby has seen these type of tackles rise recently and have had injuries from them rise as well. Get rid of it.
This isn't exactly a new technique. It's one of the better ways to tackle a ballcarrier when you are behind him; wrap him up and drop your body to drag him to the ground. It arrest his forward momentum far more than just swiping a leg or any other posterior techniques.

If it leads to injury then I understand trying to avoid it. But at the same time, this isn't like those horse collar tackles than ruined Bo Jackson's and Cadillac Williams' careers. As far as I know, these hip-drop types of tackles cause ankle sprains, hardly debilitating injuries. And they happen all the time.

This is going to make tackling harder, and just takes another tool out of defender's toolboxes to get ballcarriers to the ground. I'm all about player safety, but this feels like it's a bit much.
Yeah it's already unfair for defenders so removing this tackle not only exacerbates the advantage offense has, but can you imagine the nightmare of actually enforcing this?

Hell, the 49ers literally declined to get a safety on Dak because he was too afraid of getting a roughing call.

This shit has to stop. Football is not a safe game. That's what the money is for
User avatar
King Bootz
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:45 pm
Reputation: -633

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by King Bootz »

Cheb wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 6:28 pm
King Bootz wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:25 pm

I've hated seeing this since defenders started doing this in recent years. This technique is not taught at any level of football. Rugby has seen these type of tackles rise recently and have had injuries from them rise as well. Get rid of it.
This isn't exactly a new technique. It's one of the better ways to tackle a ballcarrier when you are behind him; wrap him up and drop your body to drag him to the ground. It arrest his forward momentum far more than just swiping a leg or any other posterior techniques.

If it leads to injury then I understand trying to avoid it. But at the same time, this isn't like those horse collar tackles than ruined Bo Jackson's and Cadillac Williams' careers. As far as I know, these hip-drop types of tackles cause ankle sprains, hardly debilitating injuries. And they happen all the time.

Let's say I'm chasing down a ballcarrier from behind and wrap him up around the waist. I strain to pull him backwards but slip, which causes my body to fall. Do I now get penalized for a hip-drop tackle?

This is going to make tackling definitely harder, and just takes another tool out of defender's toolboxes to get ballcarriers to the ground. I'm all about player safety, but this feels like it's a bit much.
It's not a technique at all. I was never taught this when I played from little league to college. This is more of a rugby style. I've never seen this taught as a way to tackle a ball carrier and it wasn't very prevalent in football until recent years.

This tackle caused the injury in the picture, Tony Pollard's broken leg. It also caused Dak Prescott's broken ankle from a few years ago, as well as Mahomes recent high ankle sprain and a number of other injuries.
Post Reply