The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
acmillis
Posts: 2826
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:47 pm
Reputation: 1043

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by acmillis »

Bootz wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:32 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:00 pm

Why?
#1 signing a player and then trading them opens yourself up to take massive dead cap hits. Let's assume a team signs Lamar to a 5 year $225mil deal with a $70mil signing bonus and Baltimore matches. Trading him would mean they eat that entire $70mil signing bonus up front. That's $70mil in dead money. It wouldn't happen. Additionally any other bonuses tied to the deal, Baltimore's salary cap would be on the hook for. Fiscally it would not be realistic.


Edit: Close to what @Snake said. They wouldn't eat all guarantee money but they would eat all bonus money as it's paid out up front and prorated.
So you were lying when you said they can’t do it.
User avatar
CantonJester
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
Reputation: 154

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by CantonJester »

Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Grahamburn
Posts: 3704
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1097

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Wow.
BucsNBills
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 566

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

CantonJester wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
If true, this presents a unique opportunity for the Bucs.
Phantom
Posts: 7280
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1258

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Yeah I think No one want to pay him the ridiculous huge guarantee money
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

CantonJester wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Miami has their QB.

Vegas doesn't want to continue shelling out draft picks so I get that.

But the other 3?? Tell your fanbase you have no intentions of winning at all. Not sure I'd say collusion just yet.
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Wait a minute! Why would all of those teams announce that they don't plan to pursue him all at once??? That is odd.
Most hated man in America.
BucsNBills
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 566

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

I wonder what consequences there would be if collusion was happening and provable.
Phantom
Posts: 7280
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1258

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Should 49ers try trade for Jackson?
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

CantonJester wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
This is fascinating at hell.

Remember, owners were pisssssed at the Haslam’s!
Image
Phantom
Posts: 7280
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1258

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Falcons fans in Atlanta are weird. They’re happy that the Falcons are out of Jackson sweepstakes because they don’t want to give up lot of draft pick and can’t afford him. Spend money on defense
User avatar
Naismith
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:41 am
Reputation: 32

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Naismith »

I want the Bucs to trade for 2024 picks and take the financial pain from past decisions, but I'd throw that plan in the trash for a shot at Lamar. Two firsts and a huge contract is a tiny amount for a 26 year old MVP QB.
GreatTimes
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
Reputation: 221

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by GreatTimes »

Bootz wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 6:02 pm Wait a minute! Why would all of those teams announce that they don't plan to pursue him all at once??? That is odd.
It is not odd when you factor in that the Ravens just announced that they were placing Jackson on the non exclusive tag.
BucsNBills
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
Reputation: 566

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by BucsNBills »

It's pretty obvious collusion, which is fucked up. Guess we'll see if the Glazers are in on the fix as well soon enough.

If not, and they show they have some balls, we could land an elite QB that can help continue the winning ways in Tampa.

I'm not sure about any of you, but I'd rather not go back to being the punching bag of the league for the next 20 years until we win another Super Bowl.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

All these teams were lining up for Deshaun Watson, an inferior player with a a major scandal looming along with clear mental problems and a very high trade price but not 1 wants a former league MVP? Yea I was wrong, that's definitely collusion.
Most hated man in America.
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

How serious was Lamar’s injury?

Anyways, I’m reading some takes about the lack of interest (with respect to the cost):

“He’s been unavailable for two playoffs pushes, straight.”

“Hasn’t won a playoff game since 2020.”

“Was an MVP 3 seasons ago. Not last season.”

“1-4 playoff record, injury prone, QBs dependent on athleticism can fall off overnight.”
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4646
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1211

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Watch Snyder offers him the deal, sealing the precedent from here forward, right as they are kicking him out. Ha!
Image
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:18 pm Watch Snyder offers him the deal, sealing the precedent from here forward, right as they are kicking him out. Ha!
I can only get so erect.

I’ll contact you if it’s there after 3 hours.
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4646
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1211

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Image
User avatar
CantonJester
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
Reputation: 154

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by CantonJester »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:36 pm
Came here to post this tweet.
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3872
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2496
Location: West Coast

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Cheb »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:36 pm
My guess:

A - Lamar wants the most guaranteed money in NFL history, and that's off-putting for a player who relys on his athleticism to make plays.
B - They don't want to give him fully guaranteed money on principle because it reinforces a bad precedent for future contracts from a team perspective (thank Deshaun Watson for being the first to do that).
C - Lamar went 15-9 the last two years and couldn't finish either season due to injury.
D - There are reports out there that Lamar could have played last season in the playoffs but chose not to, and regardless of the truth of those rumors they could plant seeds of doubt.
E - Teams don't want to pay two first rounders for the privilege of signing him, which is all the more complicated by A though D above.

Take your pick.
Image
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

People tend to forget Cousins’s fully guaranteed 3 year deal that made him the highest paid player in NFL history.

Maybe because it was only 3 years
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4646
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1211

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:53 pm People tend to forget Cousins’s fully guaranteed 3 year deal that made him the highest paid player in NFL history.

Maybe because it was only 3 years
But he was way better than Lamar.....
Most hated man in America.
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Does any team benefit from saying they’re in on Lamar?

Deny deny deny!
Image
User avatar
CantonJester
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
Reputation: 154

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by CantonJester »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Ever since the NFLPA began circling around agent-less Lamar Jackson, the rumors of a guaranteed contract swirled.

This is the owners collaborative (COUGH-collusive-COUGH) effort to clap back a the NFLPA.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Snake wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:07 pm
Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Does any team benefit from saying they’re in on Lamar?

Deny deny deny!
They don't benefit from announcing they are out on him either. Especially when no one asked
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 4646
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1211

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Doctor »

Exactly. No news would makes sense.

But hey, if all these teams want out go for it. Once the league year starts things will start to shift. Heck, if all these teams are still out I would gladly jump in. I'm sure plenty of players would restructure to bring in Lamar. I mean we really only need 5 dudes to play ball, Evans, Shaq, Godwin, Vea, CD3.
Image
User avatar
_MB_
Posts: 9297
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:28 am
Reputation: 1988

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by _MB_ »

CantonJester wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Maybe this isn't true at all.
Image
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 6632
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 1708
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Bootz »

Doctor wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:30 pm Exactly. No news would makes sense.

But hey, if all these teams want out go for it. Once the league year starts things will start to shift. Heck, if all these teams are still out I would gladly jump in. I'm sure plenty of players would restructure to bring in Lamar. I mean we really only need 5 dudes to play ball, Evans, Shaq, Godwin, Vea, CD3.
Deshaun Watson's cap hit for 2022 was just over $9mil. If we could pull this thing off, boy oh boy. I'm just glad we weren't one of those teams who bowed out without being asked a thing.
Most hated man in America.
Phantom
Posts: 7280
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1258

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Tampa Bay Buccaneers


The Buccaneers might be at the start of life without Tom Brady and should probably try and tank for USC’s Caleb Williams next year.

But wouldn’t it be really fun to see Jackson play in Western Florida? Wouldn’t be it pretty sweet to see him launch dimes to Chris Godwin and (maybe) Mike Evans? It’s not like the Buccaneers are cash-strapped. They have over $58 million in cap space, and they need a quarterback.

Getting Jackson would be bold but certainly not out of the ordinary for GM Jason Licht.
Snake
Posts: 11972
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 3245

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Snake »

_MB_ wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:37 pm
CantonJester wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.

It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Maybe this isn't true at all.
Yeah, It’s not like teams are releasing PR statements on this. It’s “team sources say” type of stuff.
Image
User avatar
_MB_
Posts: 9297
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2022 11:28 am
Reputation: 1988

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by _MB_ »

Snake wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:44 pm
_MB_ wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:37 pm
Maybe this isn't true at all.
Yeah, It’s not like teams are releasing PR statements on this. It’s “team sources say” type of stuff.
It's more likely to me than half the NFC South kicking the tires on a league MVP QB and saying "nah". Especially after watching the Bucs do it and win it all.
Image
User avatar
Cheb
Posts: 3872
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:37 pm
Reputation: 2496
Location: West Coast

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Cheb »

Phantom wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:41 pm
Tampa Bay Buccaneers


The Buccaneers might be at the start of life without Tom Brady and should probably try and tank for USC’s Caleb Williams next year.

But wouldn’t it be really fun to see Jackson play in Western Florida? Wouldn’t be it pretty sweet to see him launch dimes to Chris Godwin and (maybe) Mike Evans? It’s not like the Buccaneers are cash-strapped. They have over $58 million in cap space, and they need a quarterback.

Getting Jackson would be bold but certainly not out of the ordinary for GM Jason Licht.
Such bad journalism. Apparently that's from USA Today? For shame.
Image
Phantom
Posts: 7280
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 1258

Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread

Post by Phantom »

Cheb wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:54 pm
Phantom wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:41 pm
Such bad journalism. Apparently that's from USA Today? For shame.

Yup
Post Reply