So you were lying when you said they can’t do it.Bootz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:32 pm#1 signing a player and then trading them opens yourself up to take massive dead cap hits. Let's assume a team signs Lamar to a 5 year $225mil deal with a $70mil signing bonus and Baltimore matches. Trading him would mean they eat that entire $70mil signing bonus up front. That's $70mil in dead money. It wouldn't happen. Additionally any other bonuses tied to the deal, Baltimore's salary cap would be on the hook for. Fiscally it would not be realistic.
Edit: Close to what @Snake said. They wouldn't eat all guarantee money but they would eat all bonus money as it's paid out up front and prorated.
The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
- CantonJester
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
- Reputation: 154
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
-
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1097
-
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 566
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
If true, this presents a unique opportunity for the Bucs.CantonJester wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Yeah I think No one want to pay him the ridiculous huge guarantee money
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Miami has their QB.CantonJester wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Vegas doesn't want to continue shelling out draft picks so I get that.
But the other 3?? Tell your fanbase you have no intentions of winning at all. Not sure I'd say collusion just yet.
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Wait a minute! Why would all of those teams announce that they don't plan to pursue him all at once??? That is odd.
Most hated man in America.
-
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 566
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
I wonder what consequences there would be if collusion was happening and provable.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Should 49ers try trade for Jackson?
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
This is fascinating at hell.CantonJester wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
Remember, owners were pisssssed at the Haslam’s!
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Falcons fans in Atlanta are weird. They’re happy that the Falcons are out of Jackson sweepstakes because they don’t want to give up lot of draft pick and can’t afford him. Spend money on defense
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
I want the Bucs to trade for 2024 picks and take the financial pain from past decisions, but I'd throw that plan in the trash for a shot at Lamar. Two firsts and a huge contract is a tiny amount for a 26 year old MVP QB.
-
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
- Reputation: 221
-
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 566
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
It's pretty obvious collusion, which is fucked up. Guess we'll see if the Glazers are in on the fix as well soon enough.
If not, and they show they have some balls, we could land an elite QB that can help continue the winning ways in Tampa.
I'm not sure about any of you, but I'd rather not go back to being the punching bag of the league for the next 20 years until we win another Super Bowl.
If not, and they show they have some balls, we could land an elite QB that can help continue the winning ways in Tampa.
I'm not sure about any of you, but I'd rather not go back to being the punching bag of the league for the next 20 years until we win another Super Bowl.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
All these teams were lining up for Deshaun Watson, an inferior player with a a major scandal looming along with clear mental problems and a very high trade price but not 1 wants a former league MVP? Yea I was wrong, that's definitely collusion.
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
How serious was Lamar’s injury?
Anyways, I’m reading some takes about the lack of interest (with respect to the cost):
“He’s been unavailable for two playoffs pushes, straight.”
“Hasn’t won a playoff game since 2020.”
“Was an MVP 3 seasons ago. Not last season.”
“1-4 playoff record, injury prone, QBs dependent on athleticism can fall off overnight.”
Anyways, I’m reading some takes about the lack of interest (with respect to the cost):
“He’s been unavailable for two playoffs pushes, straight.”
“Hasn’t won a playoff game since 2020.”
“Was an MVP 3 seasons ago. Not last season.”
“1-4 playoff record, injury prone, QBs dependent on athleticism can fall off overnight.”
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Watch Snyder offers him the deal, sealing the precedent from here forward, right as they are kicking him out. Ha!
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/YWpnnMj/iabl-sig.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
I can only get so erect.
I’ll contact you if it’s there after 3 hours.
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
- CantonJester
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
- Reputation: 154
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
My guess:
A - Lamar wants the most guaranteed money in NFL history, and that's off-putting for a player who relys on his athleticism to make plays.
B - They don't want to give him fully guaranteed money on principle because it reinforces a bad precedent for future contracts from a team perspective (thank Deshaun Watson for being the first to do that).
C - Lamar went 15-9 the last two years and couldn't finish either season due to injury.
D - There are reports out there that Lamar could have played last season in the playoffs but chose not to, and regardless of the truth of those rumors they could plant seeds of doubt.
E - Teams don't want to pay two first rounders for the privilege of signing him, which is all the more complicated by A though D above.
Take your pick.
![Image](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7cy9h1G5sRA/T2dubM6GE9I/AAAAAAAAAG8/6bmSFuu3zyE/s1600/Chebington.gif)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
People tend to forget Cousins’s fully guaranteed 3 year deal that made him the highest paid player in NFL history.
Maybe because it was only 3 years
Maybe because it was only 3 years
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/YWpnnMj/iabl-sig.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
But he was way better than Lamar.....
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Does any team benefit from saying they’re in on Lamar?Doctor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Deny deny deny!
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
- CantonJester
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:55 am
- Reputation: 154
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Ever since the NFLPA began circling around agent-less Lamar Jackson, the rumors of a guaranteed contract swirled.Doctor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
This is the owners collaborative (COUGH-collusive-COUGH) effort to clap back a the NFLPA.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
They don't benefit from announcing they are out on him either. Especially when no one askedSnake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:07 pmDoes any team benefit from saying they’re in on Lamar?Doctor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 7:56 pm Yes, but it's a MARKET. It's about SHOPPING.
Maybe Lamar does want that but no one wants to give it to him, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't want to give him SOMETHING. Some offer. 90%, 80%, 70% gauranteed. If you have any interest in the guy, and they ALL should have interest, you at least talk to the guy. Why announce you're out? Especially in such a coordinated fashion?
Deny deny deny!
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Exactly. No news would makes sense.
But hey, if all these teams want out go for it. Once the league year starts things will start to shift. Heck, if all these teams are still out I would gladly jump in. I'm sure plenty of players would restructure to bring in Lamar. I mean we really only need 5 dudes to play ball, Evans, Shaq, Godwin, Vea, CD3.
But hey, if all these teams want out go for it. Once the league year starts things will start to shift. Heck, if all these teams are still out I would gladly jump in. I'm sure plenty of players would restructure to bring in Lamar. I mean we really only need 5 dudes to play ball, Evans, Shaq, Godwin, Vea, CD3.
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/YWpnnMj/iabl-sig.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Maybe this isn't true at all.CantonJester wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/Yor32ih.jpeg)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Deshaun Watson's cap hit for 2022 was just over $9mil. If we could pull this thing off, boy oh boy. I'm just glad we weren't one of those teams who bowed out without being asked a thing.Doctor wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:30 pm Exactly. No news would makes sense.
But hey, if all these teams want out go for it. Once the league year starts things will start to shift. Heck, if all these teams are still out I would gladly jump in. I'm sure plenty of players would restructure to bring in Lamar. I mean we really only need 5 dudes to play ball, Evans, Shaq, Godwin, Vea, CD3.
Most hated man in America.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
The Buccaneers might be at the start of life without Tom Brady and should probably try and tank for USC’s Caleb Williams next year.
But wouldn’t it be really fun to see Jackson play in Western Florida? Wouldn’t be it pretty sweet to see him launch dimes to Chris Godwin and (maybe) Mike Evans? It’s not like the Buccaneers are cash-strapped. They have over $58 million in cap space, and they need a quarterback.
Getting Jackson would be bold but certainly not out of the ordinary for GM Jason Licht.
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Yeah, It’s not like teams are releasing PR statements on this. It’s “team sources say” type of stuff._MB_ wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:37 pmMaybe this isn't true at all.CantonJester wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 5:48 pm Atlanta, Carolina, Miami, Vegas, and Washington are all out on Jackson. This was always about tossing a cold bucket of water on his fully guaranteed demands.
It’s totally collusion, but good luck proving it.
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/KzL9d5v/52-BC1006-0503-40-AB-8-DDC-AD5216727-D73.png)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
It's more likely to me than half the NFC South kicking the tires on a league MVP QB and saying "nah". Especially after watching the Bucs do it and win it all.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/Yor32ih.jpeg)
Re: The Official 2023 NFL Off-Season Thread
Such bad journalism. Apparently that's from USA Today? For shame.Phantom wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:41 pmTampa Bay Buccaneers
The Buccaneers might be at the start of life without Tom Brady and should probably try and tank for USC’s Caleb Williams next year.
But wouldn’t it be really fun to see Jackson play in Western Florida? Wouldn’t be it pretty sweet to see him launch dimes to Chris Godwin and (maybe) Mike Evans? It’s not like the Buccaneers are cash-strapped. They have over $58 million in cap space, and they need a quarterback.
Getting Jackson would be bold but certainly not out of the ordinary for GM Jason Licht.
![Image](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7cy9h1G5sRA/T2dubM6GE9I/AAAAAAAAAG8/6bmSFuu3zyE/s1600/Chebington.gif)