2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
Post Reply
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

So funny to me.

Anthony Nelson is a dogshit complacency signing. 2 years and $10M. He had 4 sacks and played 51% of our snaps.

Milton Williams is a brilliant forward thinking and aggressive signing. 4 years and $100M. He had 5.5 sacks and played 47% of the Eagles snaps.

Uhh.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 6316
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1797

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Doctor »

Players we moved on from are getting 3/$60M deals but guys say we're settling for mid. Okay.
Image
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:43 pm WHO ARE THE GREAT PLAYERS WE SHOULD BE SIGNING?!
Just a couple off the top of my head.

Josh Sweat nor Joey Bosa wouldn't be an upgrade over JTS?
We couldn't trade for Thuney to replace Bredeson and upgrade our OLine?
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

Backside wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:47 pm Yea rookies never make an instant impact in the NFL.
If you're counting on that, it's a flawed plan, considering half are busts.
Backside
Posts: 2111
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:05 pm
Reputation: 971

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Backside »

Big free agent signings bust plenty often too. And it’s a much bigger detriment when they do.
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

CannonFire wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:28 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:43 pm WHO ARE THE GREAT PLAYERS WE SHOULD BE SIGNING?!
Just a couple off the top of my head.

Josh Sweat nor Joey Bosa wouldn't be an upgrade over JTS?
We couldn't trade for Thuney to replace Bredeson and upgrade our OLine?
Sweat went with his boy Gannon. Landry went to his boy Vrabel. I’m sure we kicked the tires but players have to want to come here.

Is Bosa better than Reddick? He signed for less.

Thuney is about to be 33. The most successful team and front office in the NFL in the last decade is moving on from him and got value. Not saying they’re infallible but I wouldn’t trade for their players.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 13519
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 3928
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:10 pm So funny to me.

Anthony Nelson is a dogshit complacency signing. 2 years and $10M. He had 4 sacks and played 51% of our snaps.

Milton Williams is a brilliant forward thinking and aggressive signing. 4 years and $100M. He had 5.5 sacks and played 47% of the Eagles snaps.

Uhh.
What should be funny to you, or sad if we're being honest, is comparing an EDGE rusher's production to that of a DT.
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Bootz wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:57 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:10 pm So funny to me.

Anthony Nelson is a dogshit complacency signing. 2 years and $10M. He had 4 sacks and played 51% of our snaps.

Milton Williams is a brilliant forward thinking and aggressive signing. 4 years and $100M. He had 5.5 sacks and played 47% of the Eagles snaps.

Uhh.
What should be funny to you, or sad if we're being honest, is comparing an EDGE rusher's production to that of a DT.
Yeah, man. Aren’t edge rushers more valuable? Tongue in cheek. I know they play different positions.

Milton was the big prize. Is he worth ten times more? Yikes. I’m sure the boys with all the cap space in NE are happy.
Last edited by Grahamburn on Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Snake
Posts: 16595
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 5140

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Snake »

If they’re actually edge rusher specialists who get results.

Nelson is just a solid JAG who isn’t great at anything.
Image
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Snake wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:03 pm If they’re actually edge rusher specialists who get results.

Nelson is just a solid JAG who isn’t great at anything.
For sure. 100% agree.

Any evidence Williams is more than just a guy? We’ll see how he does without a bunch of studs around him. 2023 wasn’t impressive.
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

Backside wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:36 pm Big free agent signings bust plenty often too. And it’s a much bigger detriment when they do.
"Plenty"? I'd say "some".

Agreed. But there is definitely a higher rate of assurance from a FA than a draft pick, hence the higher cost. If a good player is going to a team that's better than the one he's on, generally there's an expectation that said player will be incentivized to perform at his best. Like with draft picks, I'd expect the GM and his people to do their due diligence on the players before signing (or drafting), any player. In the end, it's their call on who gets signed and/or drafted. Personally, I'd rather have my GM be more aggressive than scared. Being aggressive is going out and finding players that fit your needs and bringing them in, and paying for it. A scared GM keeps what he has and hopes his draft picks hit. Now, I don't follow a lot of other teams, but teams that I do know are more aggressive are the Eagles and Chiefs. Seems to me, their model works pretty well.
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:52 pm
CannonFire wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:28 pm

Just a couple off the top of my head.

Josh Sweat nor Joey Bosa wouldn't be an upgrade over JTS?
We couldn't trade for Thuney to replace Bredeson and upgrade our OLine?
Sweat went with his boy Gannon. Landry went to his boy Vrabel. I’m sure we kicked the tires but players have to want to come here.

Is Bosa better than Reddick? He signed for less.

Thuney is about to be 33. The most successful team and front office in the NFL in the last decade is moving on from him and got value. Not saying they’re infallible but I wouldn’t trade for their players.
Licht isn't known for being very aggressive in free agency, so if we kicked the tires, I don't think we kicked very hard.

Bosa is safer. Reddick had a hissy fit and barely tried... and stunk. If you think that the Chiefs willingness to trade Thuney should be a sign, the Eagles willing to trade Reddick should be as well. Reddick had a PFF rank of 163, Bosa was 90th. Bosa went to a Super Bowl contender, we know players take less to go to better teams. Now, Bosa is an injury risk, but I'd rather upgrade with Bosa and still draft an EDGE rusher (even in R1), then Reddick because I believe the ceiling is higher.

Thuney graded out as the 12th best guard last year (according to PFF... no, they're not the be-all-end-all, but they're a resource). Bredenson was 93rd. Thuney is also has 1 year left on his deal. I'd rather have Thuney than Bredeson, knowing I have an upgrade and a potential re-up and still be inclined to draft a guard to learn. Keeping Bredeson for 3 years, makes us less inclined to draft his replacement.
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

CannonFire wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:26 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:52 pm

Sweat went with his boy Gannon. Landry went to his boy Vrabel. I’m sure we kicked the tires but players have to want to come here.

Is Bosa better than Reddick? He signed for less.

Thuney is about to be 33. The most successful team and front office in the NFL in the last decade is moving on from him and got value. Not saying they’re infallible but I wouldn’t trade for their players.
Licht isn't known for being very aggressive in free agency, so if we kicked the tires, I don't think we kicked very hard.

Bosa is safer. Reddick had a hissy fit and barely tried... and stunk. If you think that the Chiefs willingness to trade Thuney should be a sign, the Eagles willing to trade Reddick should be as well. Reddick had a PFF rank of 163, Bosa was 90th. Bosa went to a Super Bowl contender, we know players take less to go to better teams. Now, Bosa is an injury risk, but I'd rather upgrade with Bosa and still draft an EDGE rusher (even in R1), then Reddick because I believe the ceiling is higher.

Thuney graded out as the 12th best guard last year (according to PFF... no, they're not the be-all-end-all, but they're a resource). Bredenson was 93rd. Thuney is also has 1 year left on his deal. I'd rather have Thuney than Bredeson, knowing I have an upgrade and a potential re-up and still be inclined to draft a guard to learn. Keeping Bredeson for 3 years, makes us less inclined to draft his replacement.
This entire fanbase creamed their collective pants over trying to trade for Myles Garrett. Bunch of people still want Hendrickson. Are those guys damaged goods because of their “hissy fits?”

Reddick has way more production than Bosa. It’s not even close. But, people like the big names that make the paper roster look better I guess.
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1472
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 638

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

Reddick has twice as many sacks over the last 3 years as Bosa while essentially taking last year off with a holdout.

Bosa is 100% washed and injury prone, at least Reddick you can convince yourself he will bounce back in a year he doesn’t hold out.
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

...and yet, the Eagles said "No thanks" to Reddick. Weird, huh?

Garrett's a loud mouth, Hendricks didn't throw a hissy fit. Both played great this year. Reddick stunk.

I remember 5 years ago, a lot of people said Brady was washed. How'd that turn out?
CannonFire
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:51 pm
Reputation: 497

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by CannonFire »

Aaron Rodgers is washed, right? His PFF grade this past season was 77.8. Last offseason, Mayfield got $100M and his PFF grade was 77.2.
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

CannonFire wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:36 pm ...and yet, the Eagles said "No thanks" to Reddick. Weird, huh?

Garrett's a loud mouth, Hendricks didn't throw a hissy fit. Both played great this year. Reddick stunk.

I remember 5 years ago, a lot of people said Brady was washed. How'd that turn out?
I don’t think they said, “no thanks” as much as they didn’t want to meet his asking price. Same thing for the Seahawks with Geno and D.K. or the Bengals with Hendrickson.

Reddick’s holdout was on the heels of 27 sacks in two years.

Unfortunately for Reddick the Jets decided to fuck him over too and his performance showed it.

We’ll see if we’re the last ones without a chair on HR.
Phantom
Posts: 10301
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 2130

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Phantom »

We have yet to address the secondary issues. We keep signing the same defensive players.
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 6316
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1797

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Doctor »

It's been two days. There's still literally second wave FA, the draft, and third wave FA. Relax.
Image
Phantom
Posts: 10301
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 2130

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Phantom »

Doctor wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:26 pm It's been two days. There's still literally second wave FA, the draft, and third wave FA. Relax.

Don’t hold your breath; it’s not going to happen. The Falcons will be the aggressive team during that period.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 13519
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 3928
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Bootz »

Doctor wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:26 pm It's been two days. There's still literally second wave FA, the draft, and third wave FA. Relax.
Gotta find our saviors, right?
Most hated man in America.
Grahamburn
Posts: 7176
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 2522

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Grahamburn »

Phantom wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:29 pm
Doctor wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:26 pm It's been two days. There's still literally second wave FA, the draft, and third wave FA. Relax.

Don’t hold your breath; it’s not going to happen. The Falcons will be the aggressive team during that period.
Annnnnnnnnd? They won free agency last year… Now they’ve lost several of their best players because of it.
Phantom
Posts: 10301
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:20 am
Reputation: 2130

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Phantom »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 9:25 pm
Phantom wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:29 pm


Don’t hold your breath; it’s not going to happen. The Falcons will be the aggressive team during that period.
Annnnnnnnnd? They won free agency last year… Now they’ve lost several of their best players because of it.
Annnnnnd? did you watch the last four Falcons games? Apparently not.

Raheem is a great coach huh?


carry on
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 13519
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 3928
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Bootz »

Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 9:25 pm
Phantom wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 8:29 pm


Don’t hold your breath; it’s not going to happen. The Falcons will be the aggressive team during that period.
Annnnnnnnnd? They won free agency last year… Now they’ve lost several of their best players because of it.
I thought the Eagles won FA last year.....
Most hated man in America.
User avatar
Bootz
Posts: 13519
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
Reputation: 3928
Location: In that dome of yours

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Bootz »

mdb1958 wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 12:49 pm Somebody needs to give Trask a big ole contract.
Not this year.

Most hated man in America.
mdb1958
Posts: 10184
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 575

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by mdb1958 »

Still wanna watch pre-season Pratt.
User avatar
Lordnlkon
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:19 am
Reputation: 126

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Lordnlkon »

CannonFire wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 4:26 pm
Grahamburn wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:52 pm

Sweat went with his boy Gannon. Landry went to his boy Vrabel. I’m sure we kicked the tires but players have to want to come here.

Is Bosa better than Reddick? He signed for less.

Thuney is about to be 33. The most successful team and front office in the NFL in the last decade is moving on from him and got value. Not saying they’re infallible but I wouldn’t trade for their players.
Licht isn't known for being very aggressive in free agency, so if we kicked the tires, I don't think we kicked very hard.

Bosa is safer. Reddick had a hissy fit and barely tried... and stunk. If you think that the Chiefs willingness to trade Thuney should be a sign, the Eagles willing to trade Reddick should be as well. Reddick had a PFF rank of 163, Bosa was 90th. Bosa went to a Super Bowl contender, we know players take less to go to better teams. Now, Bosa is an injury risk, but I'd rather upgrade with Bosa and still draft an EDGE rusher (even in R1), then Reddick because I believe the ceiling is higher.

Thuney graded out as the 12th best guard last year (according to PFF... no, they're not the be-all-end-all, but they're a resource). Bredenson was 93rd. Thuney is also has 1 year left on his deal. I'd rather have Thuney than Bredeson, knowing I have an upgrade and a potential re-up and still be inclined to draft a guard to learn. Keeping Bredeson for 3 years, makes us less inclined to draft his replacement.

Bosa wanted to go play with his brother. We had zero chance of ever signing him.
User avatar
Snake
Posts: 16595
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 5140

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Snake »

Bosa signed with Buffalo.
Image
User avatar
Lordnlkon
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:19 am
Reputation: 126

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Lordnlkon »

Snake wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:14 pm Bosa signed with Buffalo.

Well shit. Guess I didn’t pay attention. Last I heard he was signing with SF.
User avatar
Snake
Posts: 16595
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 5140

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Snake »

Yeah, surprised me as well. I also read the initial headlines about San Francisco.

Don’t think it matters much either way. Not sure Bosa moves the needle for this team. He’s a bigger name than producer now.
Image
User avatar
Lordnlkon
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:19 am
Reputation: 126

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Lordnlkon »

Snake wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 11:23 pm Yeah, surprised me as well. I also read the initial headlines about San Francisco.

Don’t think it matters much either way. Not sure Bosa moves the needle for this team. He’s a bigger name than producer now.

Yeah, I’m hoping Reddick pans out. Production has been there in the past and it’s not injuries that slowed him down last year. So fingers crossed, he just wasn’t happy.
User avatar
Snake
Posts: 16595
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 5140

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Snake »

Bootz wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:46 pm
mdb1958 wrote: Wed Mar 12, 2025 12:49 pm Somebody needs to give Trask a big ole contract.
Not this year.

I kinda get this one. I kinda don’t. He knows the playbook, Baker is comfy with him. I get that that’s important.

But, he sucks. And yes, backup QBs suck as a general rule. But couldn’t the Bucs find a more established commodity, who sucks a bit less? Or provides a single positive skill/attribute on the field?
Image
User avatar
Doctor
Posts: 6316
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 1797

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Doctor »

So does that make Trask officially not a bust? What's the goalpost here?
Image
User avatar
Snake
Posts: 16595
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:58 pm
Reputation: 5140

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Snake »

Bust? Wouldn’t say that. He was the last pick of the 2nd round. Was an overaged 5th year senior coming out and lacked top tier arm talent and mobility. Expectations shouldn’t have been high from jump street.

QBs like Trask hang on because they’re QB room assets, have good personalities, and make starting caliber QBs comfortable. In other words, they aren’t good enough to be a threat to the starter and can make a handful of throws in the playbook. He’s very much a success in that regard.

Regardless. This has been his career:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Image
Miller4Prez64
Posts: 1472
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
Reputation: 638

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread

Post by Miller4Prez64 »

Not a fan of Trask being back. I like Baker, but he can be reckless, I would prefer a better backup.
Post Reply