Late Night with Liam Coen!

[Bootz]

49ers>Lions>Packers>Buccaneers

Why would the Packers be in front of the Bucs when A. The Bucs beat the Packers Head to head and B. The Bucs won their division and were a higher seed.....

Make it make sense.

[real bucs fan]

49ers>Lions>Packers>Buccaneers

We beat the packers in GB week 15.

[Doctor]

[Phantom]

49ers>Lions>Packers>Buccaneers

We beat the packers in GB week 15.

Ok? The Packers beat the Cowboys in the playoffs. Do you honestly believe that the Bucs gonna beat the Cowboys? No

[Grahamburn]

We beat the packers in GB week 15.

Ok? The Packers beat the Cowboys in the playoffs. Do you honestly believe that the Bucs gonna beat the Cowboys? No

Your Mom could beat the Cowboys in the playoffs.

[real bucs fan]

We beat the packers in GB week 15.

Ok? The Packers beat the Cowboys in the playoffs. Do you honestly believe that the Bucs gonna beat the Cowboys? No

The Cowboys shit the bed against the Pack. They just didn’t show up. That game was more about the Cowboys shitting the bed than the Pack actually being good.

[Deja Entendu]

Finally got around to watching the presser, bc I’ve been traveling.

Man, this guy presents extremely well, and his energy is palpable. I hope that carries over on game day.

Excited to see what pieces we bring back and add this off-season.

[Jonny]

49ers>Lions>Packers>Buccaneers

Why would the Packers be in front of the Bucs when A. The Bucs beat the Packers Head to head and B. The Bucs won their division and were a higher seed.....

Make it make sense.

This is grade school level analysis.

You and @real bucs fan are being utter homers with this logic. The Raiders beat the Chiefs this year. The Panthers beat Texans who beat us and we beat the Panthers twice. The Packers beat the Chiefs. The Packers looked like the better team in SF.

Bucs could be a better team than the Packers, I believe they are in the same tier in the NFC. We had the same record, they have a younger, more talented roster yet to realize it's full potential. We have proven SB winning vets who are still in their prime. I believe they have the better QB and HC and may have likely upgraded at DC. I don't think it is egregious to say Packers would be better than Bucs in 24.

[Bootz]

Why would the Packers be in front of the Bucs when A. The Bucs beat the Packers Head to head and B. The Bucs won their division and were a higher seed.....

Make it make sense.

This is grade school level analysis.

You and @real bucs fan are being utter homers with this logic. The Raiders beat the Chiefs this year. The Panthers beat Texans who beat us and we beat the Panthers twice. The Packers beat the Chiefs. The Packers looked like the better team in SF.

Bucs could be a better team than the Packers, I believe they are in the same tier in the NFC. We had the same record, they have a younger, more talented roster yet to realize it's full potential. We have proven SB winning vets who are still in their prime. I believe they have the better QB and HC and may have likely upgraded at DC. I don't think it is egregious to say Packers would be better than Bucs in 24.

We're not talking about "would be". We're talking about the 2023 season.

[Phantom]

Someone mentioned Bowers from the draft thread in Coen's offense. Do we have a chance to move up for him? Probably not.

[kaimaru]

Someone mentioned Bowers from the draft thread in Coen's offense. Do we have a chance to move up for him? Probably not.

Not unless we want to lose 3 1s for him and nothing short of a QB is worth 3 1s

[Grahamburn]

I do remember O.J Howard being regarded and mocked rather highly. Top 10.

Bowers could fall. Lot of QBs, WRs, OTs, and defensive prospects littered in there.

If he dipped into the 20s it would enter my mind.

[Bootz]

I do remember O.J Howard being regarded and mocked rather highly. Top 10.

Bowers could fall. Lot of QBs, WRs, OTs, and defensive prospects littered in there.

If he dipped into the 20s it would enter my mind.

If Bowers' tape is anything like Howard's no thanks. OJ fell because teams put the tape on and saw what kind of player he really was. Every team except the Bucs of course.

[Phantom]

Bowers is not OJ Howard. Bowers is a once in lifetime generation.

[Grahamburn]

Bowers is not OJ Howard. Bowers is a once in lifetime generation.

Same things were said about Howard and Pitts. That's the only point I'm making.

[Grahamburn]

I do remember O.J Howard being regarded and mocked rather highly. Top 10.

Bowers could fall. Lot of QBs, WRs, OTs, and defensive prospects littered in there.

If he dipped into the 20s it would enter my mind.

If Bowers' tape is anything like Howard's no thanks. OJ fell because teams put the tape on and saw what kind of player he really was. Every team except the Bucs of course.

Bowers definitely has the production to back up the hype.

[Doctor]

Bowers is not OJ Howard. Bowers is a once in lifetime generation.

I hear he's more one era in a million.

[Bootz]

So I put on Brock Bowers highlights.

1st 3 minutes, I don't see OJ Howard at all. Howard sucked as a football player but he was a specimen of an athlete. Bowers isn't small but he's smaller than Howard from the looks of it and doesn't look as fast.

But I do like his elusiveness and his hands. Makes tough catches and fights for the ball. Kind of reminds me of a rich man's Eric Ebron.

I'd be happy with the pick.

[Phantom]

[kaimaru]

Bowers is not OJ Howard. Bowers is a once in lifetime generation.

A generation that currently has Kittle and Kelce?

[Phantom]

Gronk

[Doctor]

To be fair. Their generation is ending.

The Bowers, LaPorta one is beginning.