...but we had a great qb in Winston, he just needed moar thyme.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:02 am Maybe if we’d won more games and picked a little later we could have had TJ Watt at #30 instead of OJ Howard at #19.
OR, been brilliant like the Chiefs were and identified Patrick Mahomes as having “it” and being undervalued. Could have simply traded up 9 spots to get him at #10. As it were 9 teams that lost a whole bunch of games passed on him.
2023 -2024 tankathon
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Correct. And like @Snake said he wants more draft capital to take "the best player available," but teams rarely ever truly do that because it's incredibly difficult to build a roster that way.acmillis wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 8:37 am...but we had a great qb in Winston, he just needed moar thyme.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:02 am Maybe if we’d won more games and picked a little later we could have had TJ Watt at #30 instead of OJ Howard at #19.
OR, been brilliant like the Chiefs were and identified Patrick Mahomes as having “it” and being undervalued. Could have simply traded up 9 spots to get him at #10. As it were 9 teams that lost a whole bunch of games passed on him.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
That's the beauty of the dogma, you don't even have to name a guy. Because in the (statistically likely) scenario he isn't the guy you just say "well you just drafted the WRONG guy is all!"... And even in draft classes where no one was any good... then you should've kept passing until the right class came around and then tanked on THAT year, duh.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 6:58 amSo, nobody specific? I think you’re kind of a draftnik, right? I like to look at old drafts to see all of the early busts and the Coulda/woulda/shouldas of the draft.
It kind of makes you realize how arbitrary draft position really is. It’s more about the “who” than the “where.”
The 2017 draft is my favorite recent example. Loaded with hall of famers, all pros, and busts up and down each level of the first round.
Also someone may have to check the score between the kids that everyone doubts and passes on (Arod, Lamar, Allen) vs the "elite saviors" at the top.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Their job is to draft the right guy. Is it not?
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Yep. Be it based on the best available (their opinion) or need, that is definitely their job.
Don't tread on me
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
If you think Fields is their franchise QB, then IDK what to sayObsolete wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:09 pmThe Jets are hoping to get Aaron Rodgers back in time for a playoff push.
The Cardinals have their franchise qb and are trying to get into the playoffs.
Bears probably have their qb and are trying to figure out how to win...they also have a ton of picks already and will most likely have the #1 pick from the panthers.
The Vikings are the only case to be made. But before the Cousins injury, he was playing out of his mind.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
But its their job!
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
I didnt say that i thought he was. However until they say otherwise, im going to assume they think he is.kaimaru wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2023 5:23 pmIf you think Fields is their franchise QB, then IDK what to sayObsolete wrote: ↑Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:09 pm
The Jets are hoping to get Aaron Rodgers back in time for a playoff push.
The Cardinals have their franchise qb and are trying to get into the playoffs.
Bears probably have their qb and are trying to figure out how to win...they also have a ton of picks already and will most likely have the #1 pick from the panthers.
The Vikings are the only case to be made. But before the Cousins injury, he was playing out of his mind.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Just curious, what is your hit rate for "someone who can draft"?
#AllHallofFameFirst
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
See:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Every single one of those teams ahead of us should draft a QB.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
They all recently have.
-
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
- Reputation: 258
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
With the draft standings the Bears could draft 2 QB's. Maybe trade Fields away for a third QB. Won't do them any good with the upper management the Bears have.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:13 am Every single one of those teams ahead of us should draft a QB.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
The Bears are appearantly still all in on Fields (He needs more time!). The Cardinals are not moving away from Murray. NE probably will have new management and they will draft a QB. If BB stays, well...He will not draft a QB in the first round. The Giants are stuck with Danny Dimes. Tennessee just drafted their QB. Washington will have a new regime, most likely will draft a QB. Atlanta just drafted Riddler. All this is moot as we will win at least 3 more games and be way out of the huntGrahamburn wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:13 am Every single one of those teams ahead of us should draft a QB.
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Should.kaimaru wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:58 pmThe Bears are appearantly still all in on Fields (He needs more time!). The Cardinals are not moving away from Murray. NE probably will have new management and they will draft a QB. If BB stays, well...He will not draft a QB in the first round. The Giants are stuck with Danny Dimes. Tennessee just drafted their QB. Washington will have a new regime, most likely will draft a QB. Atlanta just drafted Riddler. All this is moot as we will win at least 3 more games and be way out of the huntGrahamburn wrote: ↑Fri Nov 24, 2023 9:13 am Every single one of those teams ahead of us should draft a QB.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Arizona & NY have QBs on large contracts with a ton of guaranteed money left. The numbers aren’t great but Kyler Murray has made the Cardinals a lot more competitive with his return.
That said, @Grahamburn you brought up an excellent point in the Bowles thread: It’s not all about the QB. A lot of these teams ahead of us have far reaching issues that extend past the QB. Carolina just drafted a guy #1 overall and they aren’t supporting him. Tennessee has their guy and similarly the team isn’t good enough to support him. Same thing in New England, that roster sucks. Same thing in Chicago. Washington I have no idea how they feel about Howell. I don’t think he’s all that talented but he’s not the problem. Atlanta is the one team that might be held back by QB play. They have a better overall team than most others on that list but Ridder clearly is not the guy.
That said, @Grahamburn you brought up an excellent point in the Bowles thread: It’s not all about the QB. A lot of these teams ahead of us have far reaching issues that extend past the QB. Carolina just drafted a guy #1 overall and they aren’t supporting him. Tennessee has their guy and similarly the team isn’t good enough to support him. Same thing in New England, that roster sucks. Same thing in Chicago. Washington I have no idea how they feel about Howell. I don’t think he’s all that talented but he’s not the problem. Atlanta is the one team that might be held back by QB play. They have a better overall team than most others on that list but Ridder clearly is not the guy.
Most hated man in America.
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
It’s just so obvious that those guys aren’t and will never be THE guy. That’s what happens though. The investment in money and/or picks just hinders any ability to surround that player with impact talent.
We’re stuck too though. I doubt Baker signs for a few mil again. We have multiple guys who may need to get the tag. But, I’d say that’s an option.
We’re stuck too though. I doubt Baker signs for a few mil again. We have multiple guys who may need to get the tag. But, I’d say that’s an option.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
If we're resigning Baker then things have gone pretty well.
-
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
- Reputation: 258
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
That being said I’m done with Bowles and I doubt any other incoming HC is going to want Baker over a hand picked QB. Unless it’s Canales.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
LFG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
One more loss and we are top 5
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Carolina on tap. How bad do you want it, boys?!
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Also still only one game out of first place. Lol.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Four teams “in front” of Bucs are down bad for a QB.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Carolina is due!
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Hey listen, if they want to let Marvin Harrison Jr fall to us I'm not complaining. Gladly take a QB in round 2.
-
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 1506
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
With the bears win tonight, they join the now 7 team long list of teams with 4 wins.
Their draft position remains unchanged. As their SOS is the weakest of the 7 teams.
Their draft position remains unchanged. As their SOS is the weakest of the 7 teams.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2023 -2024 tankathon
Bucs could move up one slot today with a quality LOSS.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.