IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

This section is for discussions involving the Buccaneers as a team, and other teams in the NFL.
njdungeoneer
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:41 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by njdungeoneer »

Bucs defense keeps Fields corralled:

Bucs. 27

Cubs: 19

127 yds

Go Bucs!
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8598
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 2932
Location: Virginia

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Buc2 »

All the folks predicting a Bucs win but showing the Bears with over 100 yards rushing aren’t thinking logically unless they believe the Bucs are going to come from behind to win.

If not, then that would mean the Bears will need to abandon the run, for the most part, in favor of trying for more chunk yards through the air.
Image
Don't tread on me
Grahamburn
Posts: 3559
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1020

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Grahamburn »

Buc2 wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 1:50 pm All the folks predicting a Bucs win but showing the Bears with over 100 yards rushing aren’t thinking logically unless they believe the Bucs are going to come from behind to win.

If not, then that would mean the Bears will need to abandon the run, for the most part, in favor of trying for more chunk yards through the air.
Tiebreaker is Bucs’ rushing yards.
User avatar
Buc2
Posts: 8598
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:48 pm
Reputation: 2932
Location: Virginia

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Buc2 »

Grahamburn wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 2:41 pm
Buc2 wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 1:50 pm All the folks predicting a Bucs win but showing the Bears with over 100 yards rushing aren’t thinking logically unless they believe the Bucs are going to come from behind to win.

If not, then that would mean the Bears will need to abandon the run, for the most part, in favor of trying for more chunk yards through the air.
Tiebreaker is Bucs’ rushing yards.
Oh shit! I totally read that wrong. lol
Oh well...I stay with what I have.
Image
Don't tread on me
Nobody
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2021 8:49 pm
Reputation: 1027

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Nobody »

Doubting Izien makes it out of concussion protocol so that means down a pair of CBs. I'll predict some broken play, big plays for Chicago with CBs 4 and 5 not being sticky enough. Chicago needs this one. I don't see us turning them over 3 times. Close one, but we lose at home.

Bears 23
Bucs 20

Rushing Yards 97
mdb1958
Posts: 7647
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 62

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by mdb1958 »

38 to 10 Bucs.
mdb1958
Posts: 7647
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:11 pm
Reputation: 62

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by mdb1958 »

Nobody wrote: Sat Sep 16, 2023 11:37 pm Doubting Izien makes it out of concussion protocol so that means down a pair of CBs. I'll predict some broken play, big plays for Chicago with CBs 4 and 5 not being sticky enough. Chicago needs this one. I don't see us turning them over 3 times. Close one, but we lose at home.

Bears 23
Bucs 20

Rushing Yards 97

Have our pass rush force them to run. Then not allow them to do it well!
Doooshnzl
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:18 pm
Reputation: 63

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Doooshnzl »

Bucs 28
Bears 17

124 rush yards
Doooshnzl
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:18 pm
Reputation: 63

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Doooshnzl »

Bucs 28
Bears 17

124 rush yards

Multi post...sorry
User avatar
Babeinbucland
Posts: 3995
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:33 pm
Reputation: 819

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Babeinbucland »

Doooshnzl wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2023 1:02 pm Bucs 28
Bears 17

124 rush yards

Multi post...sorry
When you nail it this close you are allowed to multi post lol
I said what I said

Image
Jonny
Posts: 694
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:34 pm
Reputation: 292

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Jonny »

Aren't there a couple of 27-16s?
User avatar
Xandtar
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 293
Location: Want a sig? PM me.

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Xandtar »

I'm working what's likely to be a 15 hour day, I'll look at it tonight. If anyone wants to crush their way through tiebreakers, please do.

I'm just glad we won, I'll read more later.

X
Image
User avatar
Xandtar
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 293
Location: Want a sig? PM me.

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Xandtar »

I'm real tired but it looks like rushing adds up to 120 yards for the Bucs. If so, looks like the 124 yards by Doooshnzl wins this week. I'd like some confirmation from someone less tired, if possible. Thanks.
Image
User avatar
Xandtar
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 2:02 pm
Reputation: 293
Location: Want a sig? PM me.

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Xandtar »

Not hearing otherwise, looks like Doooshnzl is the winner for Week 2. Congratulations! As always, if you want a winner's sig, I'll do my best to make you one. Just give me something to work with and forgive my Paint-level talent.
Image
Doooshnzl
Posts: 387
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 7:18 pm
Reputation: 63

Re: IABL Predict The Score: Week 2, Chicago at Tampa Bay, 17 September

Post by Doooshnzl »

Xandtar wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:10 am Not hearing otherwise, looks like Doooshnzl is the winner for Week 2. Congratulations! As always, if you want a winner's sig, I'll do my best to make you one. Just give me something to work with and forgive my Paint-level talent.
Thanks! No need for a sig...
Post Reply